ReviewEye (London, England)2025
The diagnosis and treatment progress of infectious endophthalmitis.
Review in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Pathogen-oriented targeted next-generation sequencing as an adjunctive tool for detection of pathogens in endophthalmitis: a retrospective clinical evaluation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- An outbreak of endogenous fungal endophthalmitis in immunocompetent individuals caused by presumed intravenous infusion contamination.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Twelve-month functional and structural outcomes ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Mitochondrial metabolic dysfunction drives PANoptosis in retinal pigment epithelium during fungal endophthalmitis: emerging roles of the MITF-FBXW7 axis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Role of Sanger Sequencing in the Early Diagnosis of Infective Endophthalmitis: Experience From a Pilot Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Endogenous endophthalmitis secondary to invasive Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess syndrome.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endophthalmitis is a blinding disease that may lead to permanent vision loss. The diagnosis of endophthalmitis relies on clinical findings. It is crucial to identify causative microorganisms in time for subsequent treatment and saving vision. For a long time, cultures of vitreous and/or aqueous humours have been the gold standard for the diagnosis of endophthalmitis. The development of modern molecular diagnostic techniques has brought new opportunities for identifying pathogens rapidly and improving sensitivity. Intravitreal antibiotic injection has the become standard treatment option for infectious endophthalmitis in clinical practice, however, the role and timing of pars plana vitrectomy remains controversial. Moreover, the development of new drugs for intravitreal injection and posterior segment drug delivery systems is expected to achieve the transition from invasive to non-invasive management. Thus, endophthalmitis is an ophthalmic emergency and timely diagnosis and treatment are crucial for preserving vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.