Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39616254›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Single and multi-objective real-time optimisation of an industrial injection moulding process via a Bayesian adaptive design of experiment approach.

Mandana Kariminejad, David Tormey, Caitríona Ryan, Christopher O'Hara, Albert Weinert, Marion McAfee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mandana KariminejadCentre for Precision Engineering, Materials and Manufacturing Research (PEM Centre), Atlantic Technological University Sligo, Ash Lane, Sligo, F91 YW50, Ireland.
David TormeyCentre for Precision Engineering, Materials and Manufacturing Research (PEM Centre), Atlantic Technological University Sligo, Ash Lane, Sligo, F91 YW50, Ireland.
Caitríona RyanI-Form, Research Centre for Advanced Manufacturing, John Hume Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Christopher O'HaraCentre for Precision Engineering, Materials and Manufacturing Research (PEM Centre), Atlantic Technological University Sligo, Ash Lane, Sligo, F91 YW50, Ireland.
Albert WeinertCentre for Precision Engineering, Materials and Manufacturing Research (PEM Centre), Atlantic Technological University Sligo, Ash Lane, Sligo, F91 YW50, Ireland.
Marion McAfeeCentre for Precision Engineering, Materials and Manufacturing Research (PEM Centre), Atlantic Technological University Sligo, Ash Lane, Sligo, F91 YW50, Ireland. marion.mcafee@atu.ie.

Funding

Science Foundation Ireland 16/RC/3872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimising cycle time without inducing quality defects is a major challenge in injection moulding (IM). Design of Experiment methods (DoE) have been widely studied for optimisation of injection moulding, however existing methods have limitations, including the need for a large number of experiments within a pre-determined search space. Bayesian adaptive design of experiment (ADoE) is an iterative process where the results of the previous experiments are used to make an informed selection for the next design. In this study, an experimental ADoE approach based on Bayesian optimisation was developed for injection moulding using process and sensor data to optimise the quality and cycle time in real-time. A novel approach for the real-time characterisation of post-production shrinkage was introduced, utilising in-mould sensor data on temperature differential during part cooling. This characterisation approach was verified by post-production metrology results. A single and multi-objective optimisation of the cycle time and temperature differential ([Formula: see text]) in an injection moulded component is proposed. The multi-objective optimisation techniques, composite desirability function and Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) using the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) model, are compared with the real-time novel ADoE approach. ADoE achieved almost a 50% reduction in the number of experiments required for the single optimisation of [Formula: see text], and an almost 30% decrease for the optimisation of [Formula: see text] and cycle time together compared to composite desirability function and NSGA-II. The optimal settings identified by ADoE for multiobjective optimisation were similar to the selected Pareto optimal solution found by NSGA-II.

Indexed as

Bayesian adaptive design of experimentsGaussian processInjection mouldingMulti-objective optimisationNondominated sorting genetic algorithm

Identifiers

PMID39616254
PMCPMC11608349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.