ArticleScientific reports2024
A computational model that integrates unrestricted callus growth, mechanobiology, and angiogenesis can predict bone healing in rodents.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recapitulating Endochondral Ossification for Bone Repair: From Development to Engineering Strategy.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Effects of soluble guanylate cyclase activator vericiguat on fracture healing in rats.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2026Article
- Computational models for predicting bone fracture healing: a review of modeling approaches, predictions, and emerging strategies.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Review
- Advancing the 3Rs in bone tissue engineering: emergingFrontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Genomechanical modeling of delayed fracture healing integrating transcriptomics and tissue mechanics.Biomaterials advances · 2026Article
- Extended view on the mechanobiology of fracture healing: interplay between mechanics and inflammation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a computational model that integrates mechanobiological regulations, angiogenesis simulations and models natural callus development to simulate bone fracture healing in rodents. The model inputs include atomic force microscopy values and micro-computed tomography on the first-day post osteotomy, which, combined with detailed finite element modeling, enables scrutinizing mechanical and biological interactions in early bone healing and throughout the healing process. The model detailed mesenchymal stem cell migration patterns, which are essential for tissue transformation and vascularization during healing, indicating the vital role of blood supply in the healing process. The model predicted bone healing in rodents (n = 48) over 21 days, matching daily tissue development with histological evidence. The developed computational model successfully predicts tissue formation rates and stiffness, reflecting physiological callus growth, and offers a method to simulate the healing process, potentially extending to humans in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.