ArticleScientific reports2024
Predicting cortical-thalamic functional connectivity using functional near-infrared spectroscopy and graph convolutional networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rs-fMRI reveals that taVNS improves cognitive and emotional function in mild cognitive impairment by reconfiguration of "sensory relay-salience-default" cross-network effective connectivity: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Trial
- GCN-Based Framework for Materials Screening and Phase Identification.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Applications and advances of combined fMRI-fNIRs techniques in brain functional research.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) measures cortical hemodynamic changes, yet it cannot collect this information from subcortical structures, such as the thalamus, which is involved in several key functional networks. To address this drawback, we propose a machine-learning-based approach to predict cortical-thalamic functional connectivity using cortical fNIRS data. We applied graph convolutional networks (GCN) to two datasets obtained from healthy adults and neonates with early brain injuries, respectively. Each dataset contained fNIRS connectivity data as input to the predictive models, while the connectivity from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) served as training targets. GCN models performed better compared to conventional methods, such as support vector machine and feedforward fully connected artificial neural networks, on both identifying the connections as binary classification tasks, and regressing the quantified strengths of connections. We also propose the addition of inter-subject connections into the GCN kernels could improve performance and that GCN models are resilient to noise in fNIRS data. Our results show it is feasible to identify subcortical activity from cortical fNIRS recordings. The findings can potentially extend the use of fNIRS in clinical settings for brain monitoring in critically ill patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.