ArticleScientific reports2024
Simulation and optimization of heavy fuel oil (HFO) refining platform to low sulfur marine fuel (LS-FO) by oxidative desulfurization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has implemented new sulfur content regulations for marine fuels in response to growing environmental concerns, including global warming. These regulations severely and costly restrict refinery operations. Oxidative desulfurization (ODS) is an attractive desulfurization method that has advantages such as mild operating conditions and a hydrogen-free process over traditional processes such as hydrodesulfurization (HDS). One can employ oxidative desulfurization in addition to or instead of hydrodesulfurization. Organic sulfur molecules undergo oxidative desulfurization, which results in the formation of polar sulfones. The refined fuel oil is then separated from the oxidized sulfones using methods such liquid-liquid extraction, distillation, and absorption. This work examines and simulates the process of separating sulfur-containing oxidized chemicals from fuel oil utilizing oxidative desulfurization technology. Acetic acid served as the catalyst and hydrogen peroxide as the chosen oxidant. This effort involved simulating the oxidative desulfurization of fuel oil and then using absorption methods to separate the oxidized sulfones. Subsequent procedures including absorption and distillation were used to separate and recover the resultant effluent, solvent, and oxidant from the remaining components. According to the simulation results, the procedure was run at 80 °C and a modest pressure of less than 5 bar. Sulfur content in the original hydrocarbon fuel was 3.5% by weight; at the output, it was less than 0.5% by weight. The findings of the sensitivity analysis of a few key factors demonstrated that the conversion percentage increased from 84 to 98% when the reactor's diameter was changed from 0.5 to 1.2 m and its length was extended to the desired amount. The reaction conversion percentage has increased significantly when the mass flow rate of hydrogen peroxide is increased from 0.5 to 1.5 kg/h, the pressure is increased from 1.5 to 5 bar, and the temperature is raised to 30 °C. According to the process optimization data, the ideal state had an exergy efficiency of 55.57%, a solvent waste rate of 1.75%, and a sulfur content of 0.22% in the fuel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.