Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39615891›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Lifestyle Profile Scale for Gravida with Urinary Incontinence: scale development and psychometric testing in Chinese Mainland.

Minna Mao, Ping Xu, Ping-Ping Guo, Xiaojuan Wang, Hongyan Wang, Suwen Feng

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Minna Mao *Women's Hospital School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7413-1554
Ping Xu *Women's Hospital School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2434-8437
Ping-Ping GuoWomen's Hospital School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5091-9387
Xiaojuan WangWomen's Hospital School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1947-5140
Hongyan WangWomen's Hospital School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8788-0680
Suwen FengWomen's Hospital School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China fengsw@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0883-0418

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesA significant number of women may experience urinary incontinence (UI) during pregnancy. While lifestyle modifications are recommended as important measures for preventing and treating UI, little is known about the lifestyle status of gravida with UI. This study aimed to develop the Lifestyle Profile Scale for Gravida with Urinary Incontinence (LPG-UI) and to evaluate its psychometric properties.

designIt was an instrument design study carried out in two stages. In stage 1, a literature review was conducted to generate the initial item pool. Subsequently, a Delphi survey was conducted to obtain expert consensus and reduce the items. In stage 2, further item reduction was performed through item analysis. Then, psychometric properties of the instrument were evaluated, including structural validity, internal consistency, split-half reliability, test-retest reliability and criterion validity.

settingThis study was conducted in obstetric clinics of a tertiary maternity hospital in Zhejiang Province, mainland China.

participantsA sample of 447 pregnant women with UI were enrolled in stage 2.

resultsA 24-item, 7-dimension lifestyle profile scale was ultimately obtained. The content validity was satisfactory. The split-half reliability and total-scale Cronbach's alpha coefficient were 0.890 and 0.819, respectively. The criterion validity was 0.598. The seven-factor model, which accounted for 63.667% of the total item variance, demonstrated a good fit with the data ([Formula: see text] =1.672, root mean square error of approximation=0.053, goodness of fit=0.884).

conclusionsThe LPG-UI has sufficient validity and reliability for assessing the lifestyle status of pregnant women with UI.

Indexed as

Life StylePsychometricsUrinary IncontinenceAdultChinaDelphi TechniqueEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesHealthHealth EducationNursing CarePregnant WomenUrinary incontinencesUrogynaecology

Identifiers

PMID39615891
PMCPMC11624776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.