Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39615889›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Protocol for a multicentre randomised triple-blind controlled trial assessing the clinical efficacy of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injections versus placebo in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (PIKOA).

Florent Eymard, Nadia Oubaya, Paul Ornetti, Jeremie Sellam, Pascal Richette, Xavier Chevalier, PIKOA study group

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05378815 (Platelet-rich Plasma in Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05378815 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Platelet-rich Plasma in Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicentre Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2025 to 2028Enrolled210ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsPRP injection, Placebo injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Florent EymardDepartment of Rheumatology, Henri Mondor Hospital Rheumatology Service, Creteil, France florent.eymard@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2758-5216
Nadia OubayaDepartment of Public Health, AP-HP, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France.
Paul OrnettiDepartment of Rheumatology, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Jeremie SellamCRSA Inserm UMRS_938, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Pascal RichetteRheumatology, AP-HP Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France.
Xavier ChevalierDepartment of Rheumatology, AP-HP Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France.
PIKOA study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite their exponential use, intra-articular (IA) injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) are not part of the recommended treatments for knee osteoarthritis (OA) by most international scientific societies. The most recent clinical trials have shown conflicting results, and some did not find any clinical benefit of PRP injections. The PRP In Knee OsteoArthritis (PIKOA) trial was designed to assess the clinical efficacy and structural benefit of IA injections of PRP vs saline solution (placebo) in symptomatic knee OA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PIKOA is an academic phase 3, superiority, triple-blind (patients, investigators and injectors), multicentre, randomised placebo-controlled trial (1:1 ratio). It compares the efficacy of 1 weekly IA injection of 5 mL PRP or placebo (saline solution) for 3 weeks with a 6-month follow-up. The trial will enrol 210 participants ≥40 years old with symptomatic and moderate radiographic knee OA (Kellgren and Lawrence grade 2 or 3). PRP is prepared with the A-CP-Kit-T (20 mL) kit and its cellular composition is characterised for each patient. The main objective is to compare change in pain on a 0 mm to 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) between W0 and W14. The secondary objectives are to compare the two groups in terms of decrease in VAS pain, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index total score and subscores, analgesics consumption, OMERACT-Osteoarthritis Research Society International responder rate and improvement in quality of life measured by the EQ-5D-5L score. All these criteria are assessed at W8, W14 and W26. The decrease in serum Coll2-1 and Coll2-1 NO₂ levels (catabolic markers, reflecting cartilage destruction or joint inflammation) and increase in N-propeptide of cartilage IIA level (reflecting cartilage formation) are assessed at W8 and W14. Adverse events and study withdrawals are collected during the study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Nord Ouest ethical committee (2021-A00742-39). All participants need to provide written informed consent. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05378815 (ClinicalTrials.gov); pre-results.Protocol version and number: V.3 of 17 July 2023.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneePlatelet-Rich PlasmaAdultEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicPain MeasurementQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeKneeORTHOPAEDIC & TRAUMA SURGERYRHEUMATOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID39615889
PMCPMC11624835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.