Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39615658›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2025

Characterization of a Time-Resolved, Real-Time Scintillation Dosimetry System for Ultra-High Dose-Rate Radiation Therapy Applications.

Alexander Baikalov, Daline Tho, Kevin Liu, Stefan Bartzsch, Sam Beddar, Emil Schüler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Development and application ofPhysics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexander BaikalovDepartment of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Daline ThoDepartment of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Kevin LiuDepartment of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Stefan BartzschDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Sam BeddarDepartment of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: abeddar@mdanderson.org.
Emil SchülerDepartment of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: eschueler@mdanderson.org.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Research Supplements to Promote Diversity in Health-Related Research: Preclinical optimization of ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy parameters for translational relevanceR01CA266673 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SCHUELER, EMIL · 2022 to 2025
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA266673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeScintillation dosimetry has promising qualities for ultra-high-dose-rate (UHDR) radiation therapy (RT), but no system has shown compatibility with mean dose rates (DR¯) above 100 Gy/s and doses per pulse (D METHODS AND MATERIALS: We undertook a thorough dosimetric characterization of the system on an UHDR electron beamline. The system's response as a function of dose, DR¯, D

resultsWithin a tolerance of ±3%, the system exhibited dose linearity and was independent of DR¯ and D

conclusionsWith daily calibrations and DR

Indexed as

RadiometryScintillation CountingHumansParticle AcceleratorsRadiotherapy DosageTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID39615658
PMCPMC12335921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.