ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2025
The Validation of Digital PCR-Based Minimal Residual Disease Detection for the Common Mutations in IDH1 and IDH2 Genes in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Measurable residual disease-guided therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia: Practical insights.British journal of haematology · 2025Review
- RAB39B: A novel biomarker for acute myeloid leukemia identified via multi-omics and functional validation.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) is crucial for effective management of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This study aims to validate MRD detection of the seven most common IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in patients with AML using a QuantStudio 3D digital PCR platform. This assay demonstrated a high concordance for the variant allele frequencies between digital PCR and next-generation sequencing assays. Precision analysis revealed only small variation (<0.5 log10) for all mutations near or at the limit of detection level. This validation also showed a great reproducibility for interrun and intrarun comparisons (28 runs, variation ranges from 0 to 0.48 log10), ensuring comparable results for patient follow-ups. The limit of detection was determined to be 0.1% for all mutations, except the IDH2 R140Q mutation, which was 0.5%. Controls and acceptable ranges were also established for each mutation during validation. This study suggests that the QuantStudio 3D digital PCR assay is a quantitative, sensitive, and reproducible platform for monitoring MRD in patients with AML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.