Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39615502›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine2025

Treating eosinophilic exacerbations of asthma and COPD with benralizumab (ABRA): a double-blind, double-dummy, active placebo-controlled randomised trial.

Sanjay Ramakrishnan, Richard E K Russell, Hafiz R Mahmood, Karolina Krassowska, James Melhorn, Christine Mwasuku, Ian D Pavord, Laura Bermejo-Sanchez, Imran Howell, Mahdi Mahdi and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Update on Pediatric asthma management: Recent advances.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The rhinovirus puzzle: Linking virus and host factors to childhood asthma.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sanjay RamakrishnanInstitute for Respiratory Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Respiratory Medicine Unit and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Richard E K RussellRespiratory Medicine Unit and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; King's Centre for Lung Health, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Hafiz R MahmoodInstitute for Respiratory Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Karolina KrassowskaRespiratory Medicine Unit and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
James MelhornRespiratory Medicine Unit and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Christine MwasukuRespiratory Medicine Unit and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ian D PavordRespiratory Medicine Unit and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Laura Bermejo-SanchezRespiratory Medicine Unit and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Imran HowellRespiratory Medicine Unit and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Mahdi MahdiRespiratory Medicine Unit and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Stefan PetersonStatMind, Lund, Sweden.
Thomas BengtssonStatMind, Lund, Sweden.
Mona BafadhelNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; King's Centre for Lung Health, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK. Electronic address: mona.bafadhel@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExacerbations of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are important events and are associated with critical illness. Eosinophilic inflammation is a treatable trait commonly found during acute exacerbations of asthma and COPD. We hypothesised that for patients with eosinophilic exacerbations, a single injection of benralizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody against interleukin-5 receptor-α, alone or in combination with prednisolone, will improve clinical outcomes compared with prednisolone, the standard of care.

methodsThe Acute exacerbations treated with BenRAlizumab trial (ABRA) was a multicentre, phase 2, double-blind, double-dummy, active placebo-controlled randomised trial completed in the UK at Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust. Patients were recruited from urgent care clinics and emergency departments of these two hospitals. At the time of an acute exacerbation of asthma or COPD, adults with blood eosinophil counts of equal to or more than 300 cells per μL were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive acute treatment with: prednisolone 30 mg once daily for 5 days and 100 mg benralizumab subcutaneous injection once (BENRA plus PRED group); placebo tablets once daily for 5 days and 100 mg benralizumab subcutaneous injection once (BENRA group); or prednisolone 30 mg once daily for 5 days and placebo subcutaneous injection once (PRED group). Randomisation was performed with a centralised interactive computer randomisation service. All patients and study research staff involved in data collection were masked to study blood results and treatment allocation. The co-primary outcomes were proportion of treatment failures over 90 days and total visual analogue scale (VAS) symptoms at day 28 in the pooled benralizumab groups compared with the prednisolone alone group and analysed in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered on Clinicaltrials.govNCT04098718.

findingsBetween May 13, 2021, and Feb 5, 2024, 287 patients were screened for study inclusion. 129 were excluded due to not having an exacerbation captured or not meeting the eosinophil exclusion criteria. 158 patients were randomly assigned at acute eosinophilic exacerbation of asthma or COPD where 86 (54%) patients were female and 72 (46%) were male with a mean age of 57 years (range, 18-84). 53 patients were randomly assigned to the PRED group, 53 were randomly assigned to the BENRA group, and 52 were assigned to the BENRA plus PRED treatment group. At 90 days, treatment failures occurred in 39 (74%) of 53 in the PRED group, and 47 (45%) of 105 in the pooled-BENRA group (OR 0·26 [95% CI 0·13-0·56]; p=0·0005). The 28-day total VAS mean difference was 49 mm (95% CI 14-84; p=0·0065), favouring the pooled-BENRA group. There were no fatal adverse events and benralizumab was well tolerated. Notably, hyperglycaemia and sinusitis or sinus infection adverse events were related to the prednisolone study drug only.

interpretationBenralizumab can be used as a treatment of acute eosinophilic exacerbations and achieves better outcomes than the current standard of care with prednisolone alone. These results offer a new way of treating eosinophilic endotypes of asthma and COPD exacerbations.

fundingAstraZeneca.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAsthmaPrednisolonePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdultAgedAnti-Asthmatic AgentsDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationEosinophilsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedbenralizumabPrednisolone

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.