Trial reportThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine2025
Treating eosinophilic exacerbations of asthma and COPD with benralizumab (ABRA): a double-blind, double-dummy, active placebo-controlled randomised trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Telemonitoring on Moderate and Severe Exacerbations in Patients with COPD: Pooled Analysis of Two Randomized Controlled Trials in Denmark.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Trial
- An Eight-Century Evolution of Asthma Therapeutics in Western Countries: From Medieval Regimens to Anti-inflammatory Reliever Therapy and Precision Biologics.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Not All Flares Are Equal: Stratifying Risk During Asthma/COPD Overlap Exacerbations.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2026Article
- COPD Biologics: Right Patient, Right Pathway, Right Time.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Review
- Update on Pediatric asthma management: Recent advances.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026Review
- Eosinophil biology in COPD: from scientific insight to clinical treatment action.ERJ open research · 2026Review
- Biologics in Older Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- From Inflammation to Precision Medicine: Mechanistic Insights into Asthma, COPD, and IPF.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Blood eosinophil counts and postoperative outcomes in early-stage lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Blood eosinophil count as a biomarker for therapy guidance in COPD and asthma exacerbations.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Article
- Biologics in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Current Status and Future Prospects.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2026Article
- Review
- The rhinovirus puzzle: Linking virus and host factors to childhood asthma.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2026Review
- Treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current pipeline and new opportunities.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026Review
- Severe Asthma Exacerbations: From Risk Factors to Precision Management Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Real-World Identification of Eosinophilic COPD Patients Potentially Eligible for Dupilumab: A Retrospective Observational Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Observational
- Efficacy of electroacupuncture in the treatment of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease: study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Airway pressure release ventilation in acute severe asthma: a case series and physiologic framework.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Biological treatments for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.BMJ medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExacerbations of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are important events and are associated with critical illness. Eosinophilic inflammation is a treatable trait commonly found during acute exacerbations of asthma and COPD. We hypothesised that for patients with eosinophilic exacerbations, a single injection of benralizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody against interleukin-5 receptor-α, alone or in combination with prednisolone, will improve clinical outcomes compared with prednisolone, the standard of care.
methodsThe Acute exacerbations treated with BenRAlizumab trial (ABRA) was a multicentre, phase 2, double-blind, double-dummy, active placebo-controlled randomised trial completed in the UK at Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust. Patients were recruited from urgent care clinics and emergency departments of these two hospitals. At the time of an acute exacerbation of asthma or COPD, adults with blood eosinophil counts of equal to or more than 300 cells per μL were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive acute treatment with: prednisolone 30 mg once daily for 5 days and 100 mg benralizumab subcutaneous injection once (BENRA plus PRED group); placebo tablets once daily for 5 days and 100 mg benralizumab subcutaneous injection once (BENRA group); or prednisolone 30 mg once daily for 5 days and placebo subcutaneous injection once (PRED group). Randomisation was performed with a centralised interactive computer randomisation service. All patients and study research staff involved in data collection were masked to study blood results and treatment allocation. The co-primary outcomes were proportion of treatment failures over 90 days and total visual analogue scale (VAS) symptoms at day 28 in the pooled benralizumab groups compared with the prednisolone alone group and analysed in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered on Clinicaltrials.govNCT04098718.
findingsBetween May 13, 2021, and Feb 5, 2024, 287 patients were screened for study inclusion. 129 were excluded due to not having an exacerbation captured or not meeting the eosinophil exclusion criteria. 158 patients were randomly assigned at acute eosinophilic exacerbation of asthma or COPD where 86 (54%) patients were female and 72 (46%) were male with a mean age of 57 years (range, 18-84). 53 patients were randomly assigned to the PRED group, 53 were randomly assigned to the BENRA group, and 52 were assigned to the BENRA plus PRED treatment group. At 90 days, treatment failures occurred in 39 (74%) of 53 in the PRED group, and 47 (45%) of 105 in the pooled-BENRA group (OR 0·26 [95% CI 0·13-0·56]; p=0·0005). The 28-day total VAS mean difference was 49 mm (95% CI 14-84; p=0·0065), favouring the pooled-BENRA group. There were no fatal adverse events and benralizumab was well tolerated. Notably, hyperglycaemia and sinusitis or sinus infection adverse events were related to the prednisolone study drug only.
interpretationBenralizumab can be used as a treatment of acute eosinophilic exacerbations and achieves better outcomes than the current standard of care with prednisolone alone. These results offer a new way of treating eosinophilic endotypes of asthma and COPD exacerbations.
fundingAstraZeneca.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39615502What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.