ArticleEBioMedicine2024
Assessing the direct and spillover protective effectiveness of Wolbachia-mediated introgression to combat dengue.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adjacent spillover efficacy of Wolbachia for control of dengue: emulation of a cluster randomised target trial.BMC medicine · 2025Trial
- Barriers in operating proactive source reduction informed by an early warning system for dengue prevention: A qualitative study from end-user perspectives in Vietnam.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Navigating evidence-informed decision making for arboviral disease control in Pacific Island countries.BMC global and public health · 2026Review
- Measuring real-time disease transmissibility with temperature-dependent generation intervals.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Prevention and control of dengue and Aedes mosquitoes in South and Southeast Asia: Interventions, challenges, and future recommendations.Dialogues in health · 2025Review
- ExploitingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDengue remains a global health challenge with limited treatment options, highlighting the need for effective vector control strategies. The introduction of Wolbachia pipientis into Aedes aegypti populations has shown success in reducing dengue transmission across global field trials. However, the spillover effectiveness of the technology on untreated areas is not well-known. This study estimates the spillover protective effectiveness (PE) of Wolbachia-mediated introgression on dengue.
methodsWe used the synthetic control method (SCM) under assumption of partial interference to evaluate the direct and spillover PEs of Wolbachia-mediated introgression in a long-running operational trial of the intervention in Malaysia. Synthetic controls (SCs), which comprise of a weighted sum of non-spillover controls, were constructed for each directly-treated and spillover site in the pre-intervention period to account for historical imbalances in dengue risk and risk trajectories. SCs were compared to directly/spillover-treated sites to estimate the impact of Wolbachia-introgression on dengue incidence across each site, calendar year and intervention time. Robustness checks, including visual inspections, root-mean-square error (RMSE) calculations, in-space and in-time placebo checks, and permutation tests, were used to inspect the model's ability in attributing dengue incidence reductions to the Wolbachia interventions.
findingsThe direct and spillover PEs of Wolbachia on dengue incidence were expressed as a percentage reduction of dengue incidence, or the absolute case reductions, by comparing SCs to actual intervention/spillover sites. Findings indicate a direct reduction in dengue incidence by 64.35% (95% CI: 63.50-66.71, p < 0.05 using permutation tests) in directly treated areas, corresponding to 1802 (95% CI: 1768-1932) cases averted. Meanwhile, spillover effects contributed to a 37.69% (95% CI: 36.45-38.49, p < 0.05) reduction in adjacent non-intervention areas, accounting for 115 (95% CI: 104-132) absolute cases averted. Tracking PEs by intervention time revealed a dose-response relationship, where PEs increased concomitantly with Wolbachia frequency. Model checks confirmed the robustness of these results, and ascertained that these PEs were not an artefact of poor control selection, pre-trends in dengue incidence or poor predictive ability of the fitted SCs.
interpretationWolbachia-introgression effectively diminished dengue incidence in directly-treated and surrounding spillover regions. This dual effectiveness highlights the potential of Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes as a sustainable, cost-effective strategy against dengue.
fundingThis research is hosted by CNRS@CREATE and supported by the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore, under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) program, and is funded by the Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine-Ministry of Education Start-Up Grant. The original Hoffmann et al. (2024) study was funded by the Wellcome Trust Awards 226166, 108508, 202888 and the Ministry of Health Malaysia NMRR-16-297-28898.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.