Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39615411›Full record

ArticleLung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025

The efficacy of continuing osimertinib with platinum pemetrexed chemotherapy upon progression in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer harboring sensitizing EGFR mutations.

Tejas Patil, Dexiang Gao, Alexander Watson, Mandy Sakamoto, Yunan Nie, Amanda Gibson, Michelle L Dean, Benjamin A Yoder, Eliza Miller, Margaret Stalker and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Tejas PatilDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/TejasPatilMD.
Dexiang GaoDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Alexander WatsonDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Mandy SakamotoDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Yunan NieYale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Amanda GibsonGlans-Look Lung Cancer Research, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Michelle L DeanGlans-Look Lung Cancer Research, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Benjamin A YoderDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Eliza MillerDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Margaret StalkerAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Dara L AisnerDepartment of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Paul A BunnDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Erin L SchenkDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Melina E MarmarelisAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Chiara BennatiDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, AUSL della Romagna, Ravenna, Italy.
Vishal NavaniGlans-Look Lung Cancer Research, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Yongchang ZhangHunan Cancer Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Changsha, China.
D Ross CamidgeDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

University of Colorado Cancer Center Support Grant - Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts with Autologous Human Immune SystemsP30CA046934 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI James V Degregori · 1988 to 2026
$117.0M
NIH Prior Approval Process ProfessionalUL1TR002535 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2018 to 2022
$51.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002535NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFor patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC who progress on osimertinib, the clinical benefit of continuing osimertinib with next line platinum pemetrexed chemotherapy remains unknown.

methodsIn this international, multi-center, retrospective cohort study, a total of 159 patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC who progressed on osimertinib and received platinum-pemetrexed therapy on progression from 2013 to 2023 were included. The data cutoff was December 31, 2023. Data analysis was conducted from January 2024 to June 2024. The primary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Multivariable Cox regression adjusting for patient-specific and cancer-specific factors was performed.

results421 patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC with progression on osimertinib were identified, of which159 patients who met pre-specified inclusion criteria were divided into two groups: Cohort 1 (osimertinib + platinum-pemetrexed) included 50 patients (median [IQR] age, 59 [30 - 83] years; 36 [72.0 %] female; 11 [22.4 %] Asian) and Cohort 2 (platinum-pemetrexed alone) included 109 patients (median [IQR] age, 54 [25 - 80] years; 62 [56.9 %] female; 74 [64.9 %] Asian). Most patients were never smokers (Cohort 1, 37 [74.0 %]; Cohort 2, 66 [60.6 %]). One third of patients had baseline brain metastases (Cohort 1, 19 [38.0 %]; Cohort 2, 36 [38.3 %]). Both cohorts had a median of two prior lines of anti-cancer therapy. The addition of bevacizumab or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) to next-line platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy was more common in Cohort 2 (bevacizumab use, 30.3 % vs 8.0 %, p = 0.002; ICI use, 33.0 % vs 2.0 %, p = 0.001). With a median duration of follow up of 30 months, there was a significant PFS benefit to continuing osimertinib with next line platinum pemetrexed chemotherapy (9.0 vs 4.5 months; HR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.32 - 0.74, p = 0.0032), also seen in subset analyses of patients who received first line osimertinib (n = 55, 11.0 vs 6.2 months; HR 0.41, 95 % CI 0.25 - 0.73, p = 0.002). Among patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC without brain metastases after progression on osimertinib, we found that continuing osimertinib with next line platinum pemetrexed significantly reduced the median time to CNS progression (n = 38; 7.0 vs 4.1 months; HR 0.47, 95 % CI 0.48 - 0.98, p = 0.01). After adjusted analysis, there was no significant OS difference between Cohorts 1 and 2 (19 months vs 13 months; HR 0.92, 95 % CI 0.60 - 1.39, p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: For patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC who progress on osimertinib, there is a significant PFS, but not OS, benefit to continuing osimertinib with next line platinum pemetrexed chemotherapy. The continuation of osimertinib with next line platinum pemetrexed chemotherapy appears to reduce the risk of CNS progression.

Indexed as

AcrylamidesAniline CompoundsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsMutationPemetrexedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease ProgressionErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansIndolesMaleAcrylamidesAniline CompoundsEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsIndolesosimertinibPemetrexedPyrimidinesChemotherapyEGFRNSCLCOsimertinibTyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID39615411
PMCPMC11787869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.