Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39615343›Full record

ReviewVaccine2025

The evidence base for rotavirus vaccination in India: Current status, future needs.

Niranjan Bhat, Elisabeth Vodicka, Allison Clifford, Kanduri Balaji Ananth, Ashish Bavdekar, Arup Deb Roy, Umesh Parashar, Jacqueline Tate, Pradeep Haldar, Gagandeep Kang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Niranjan BhatCenter for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA. Electronic address: nbhat@path.org.
Elisabeth VodickaCenter for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA.
Allison CliffordCenter for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, 455 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20001, USA.
Kanduri Balaji AnanthCenter for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, 15th Floor, Dr. Gopal Das Bhawan, 28 Barakhamba Road, New Delhi 110001, India.
Ashish BavdekarKEM Hospital Research Centre, Vadu Rural Health Program, P.O. Vadu Budruk, Taluka Shirur, District Pune 412216, India.
Arup Deb RoyJSI India, Plot No.5 & 6, LSC Shopping Complex, Nelson Mandela Marg, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi 110070, India.
Umesh ParasharCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Jacqueline TateCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Pradeep HaldarFormer Advisor (RCH), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Delhi, India.
Gagandeep KangDivision of Gastrointestinal Sciences, The Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu 632004, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rotavirus is a leading cause of severe diarrheal disease in infants and young children worldwide. Vaccination offers the best protection against this disease, and two rotavirus vaccines were developed in India and included in its routine immunization program. The Government of India's decision to adopt this intervention was supported by a solid base of evidence from clinical trials, as well as substantial research regarding rotavirus disease burden and the potential health and economic value of immunization. Following program implementation, multiple studies were initiated, including three evaluations of effectiveness and several investigations regarding intussusception. These additional data regarding vaccine impact, safety, and delivery from post-introduction evaluations in conditions of real-world use will further strengthen and sustain the immunization program. This manuscript evaluates the status of existing and forthcoming evidence regarding rotavirus vaccination in India through a literature review and consultation with relevant stakeholders. Studies evaluating vaccine impact, effectiveness, safety, health economics, and acceptability, as well as operational and programmatic research, were included in the review. Overall, we found that the evidence base did not contain any major gaps. Nevertheless, additional smaller-scale research studies would be valuable in providing a more complete picture of rotavirus vaccine performance and benefit. Documentation of India's experience with rotavirus vaccines may provide lessons learned for other countries in the Asia region, where rotavirus disease burden remains high, yet vaccine adoption has been slow, as well as for countries worldwide that may be considering implementation of the Indian-made rotavirus vaccines.

Indexed as

Immunization ProgramsRotavirus InfectionsRotavirus VaccinesVaccinationDiarrheaHumansIndiaInfantRotavirusVaccine EfficacyRotavirus VaccinesDiarrheaIndiaRotavirusRotavirus vaccineVaccinationVaccine impact

Identifiers

PMID39615343
PMCPMC11672240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.