Trial reportVaccine2025
Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated recombinant Newcastle disease virus vaccine expressing SARS-CoV-2 spike: A randomised, comparator-controlled, phase 2 trial.
Trial report in Vaccine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Production of affordable coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in low- and lower-middle-income countries is needed. NDV-HXP-S is an inactivated egg-based recombinant Newcastle disease virus vaccine expressing the spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A public sector manufacturer in Vietnam assessed the immunogenicity of NDV-HXP-S (COVIVAC) relative to an authorized vaccine. This phase 2 stage of a randomised, observer-blind, controlled, phase 1/2 trial was conducted at three community health centers in Thai Binh Province, Vietnam. Healthy males and non-pregnant females, 18 years of age and older, were eligible. Participants were randomised by age (18-59, ≥60 years) to receive one of three treatments by intramuscular injection twice, 28 days apart: COVIVAC at 3 μg or 6 μg, or AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine VAXZEVRIA™. Participants and personnel assessing outcomes were masked to treatment. The vaccine dose was selected based on Phase 1 results. A 6 μg dose was chosen to explore the immunogenicity gain over the 3-μg dose. The study's aim is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of COVIVAC at two dose levels compared to VAXZEVRIA, the most commonly used COVID-19 vaccine in Vietnam. The main outcome was the induction of 50% neutralising antibody titers against vaccine-homologous pseudotyped virus 14 days (day 43) and 6 months (day 197) after the second vaccination by age group. The primary immunogenicity and safety analyses included all participants who received one dose of the vaccine. ClinicalTrials.govNCT05940194. During August 10-23, 2021, 737 individuals were screened, and 374 were randomised (124-125 per group); all subjects received vaccine dose one and all but three received doses two four weeks later. Subjects 18-59 years of age achieved the following geometric mean titers of PNA 14 days after vaccine dose two: 153⋅28 (95 % CI 124·2-189⋅15) for COVIVAC 3 μg, 176⋅2 (95 % CI 141⋅45-220.27) for COVIVAC 6 μg, and 99⋅92(95 % CI 80.80-123⋅56) for VAXZEVRIA. Subjects ≥60 years of age also achieved potent geometric mean titers of PNA at the same timepoint: 183⋅57 (95 % CI 133.4-252⋅61) for COVIVAC 3 μg, 257⋅87 (95 % CI 181⋅6-367⋅18) for COVIVAC 6 μg, and 79⋅49(95 % CI 55⋅68-113⋅4) for VAXZEVRIA. On day 43, the geometric mean fold rise of 50 % neutralising antibody titers for subjects age 18-59 years was 31·20 (COVIVAC 3 μg N = 82, 95 % CI 25·14-38·74), 35·80 (COVIVAC 6 μg; N = 83, 95 % CI 29·03-44·15), 18·85 (VAXZEVRIA; N = 82, 95 % CI 15·10-23·54), and for subjects age ≥ 60 years was 37·27 (COVIVAC 3 μg; N = 42, 95 % CI 27·43-50·63), 50·10 (COVIVAC 6 μg; N = 40, 95 % CI 35·46-70·76), 16·11 (VAXZEVRIA; N = 40, 95 % CI 11·73-22·13). Among subjects seronegative for anti-S IgG at baseline, the day 43 geometric mean titer ratio of neutralising antibody (COVIVC 6 μg/VAXZEVRIA) was 1·77 (95 % CI 1·30-2·40) for subjects age 18-59 years and 3·24 (95 % CI 1·98-5·32) for subjects age ≥ 60 years. On day 197, the age-specific ratios were 1·11 (95 % CI 0·51-2·43) and 2·32 (0·69-7·85). Vaccines were well tolerated; reactogenicity was predominantly mild and transient. The percentage of subjects with unsolicited adverse events (AEs) during 28 days after vaccinations was similar among treatments (COVIVAC 3 μg 29·0 %, COVIVAC 6 μg 23·2 %, VAXZEVRIA 31·2 %); no vaccine-related AE was reported. Considering that induction of neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 has been correlated with the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, including VAXZEVRIA, our results suggest that vaccination with COVIVAC may afford clinical benefit matching or exceeding that of the VAXZEVRIA vaccine. ClinicalTrials.govNCT05940194.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.