Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39615342›Full record

Trial reportVaccine2025

Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated recombinant Newcastle disease virus vaccine expressing SARS-CoV-2 spike: A randomised, comparator-controlled, phase 2 trial.

Vu Dinh Thiem, Dang Duc Anh, Vu Hai Ha, Nguyen Van Thom, Tran Cong Thang, Jose Mateus, Juan Manuel Carreño, Rama Raghunandan, Nguyen Mai Huong, Laina D Mercer and 9 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Vaccine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Vu Dinh ThiemNational Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, 1 Yersin Street, Hai Ba Trung District, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Dang Duc AnhNational Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, 1 Yersin Street, Hai Ba Trung District, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Vu Hai HaNational Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, 1 Yersin Street, Hai Ba Trung District, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Nguyen Van ThomCenter for Disease Control, Thai Binh Province, 10 Hoàng Công Chất street, Quang Trung ward, Thai Binh, Viet Nam.
Tran Cong ThangPATH Vietnam, Hanoi Towers, 49 Hai Ba Trung Street, Hoan Kiem District, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Jose MateusCenter for Infectious Disease and Vaccine Research, La Jolla Institute for Immunology (LJI), La Jolla, CA, USA.
Juan Manuel CarreñoDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York, New York, NY, USA; Center for Vaccine Research and Pandemic Preparedness (C-VaRPP) at Mount Sinai New York, New York, NY, USA.
Rama RaghunandanCenter for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA. Electronic address: rraghunandan@path.org.
Nguyen Mai HuongPATH Vietnam, Hanoi Towers, 49 Hai Ba Trung Street, Hoan Kiem District, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Laina D MercerCenter for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA.
Jorge FloresCenter for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA.
E Alexandar EscarregaCenter for Infectious Disease and Vaccine Research, La Jolla Institute for Immunology (LJI), La Jolla, CA, USA.
Ariel RaskinDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York, New York, NY, USA; Center for Vaccine Research and Pandemic Preparedness (C-VaRPP) at Mount Sinai New York, New York, NY, USA.
Duong Huu ThaiInstitute of Vaccines and Medical Biologicals, 9 Pasteur, Xuong Huan, Nha Trang City, Khanh Hoa, Viet Nam.
Le Van BeInstitute of Vaccines and Medical Biologicals, 9 Pasteur, Xuong Huan, Nha Trang City, Khanh Hoa, Viet Nam.
Alessandro SetteCenter for Infectious Disease and Vaccine Research, La Jolla Institute for Immunology (LJI), La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, (UCSD), La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Bruce L InnisCenter for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, 2201 Westlake Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98121, USA.
Florian KrammerDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York, New York, NY, USA; Center for Vaccine Research and Pandemic Preparedness (C-VaRPP) at Mount Sinai New York, New York, NY, USA; Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, New York, USA. Electronic address: florian.krammer@mssm.edu.
Daniela WeiskopfCenter for Infectious Disease and Vaccine Research, La Jolla Institute for Immunology (LJI), La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, (UCSD), La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA. Electronic address: daniela@lji.org.

Funding

Large Scale T Cell Epitope Discovery:Global identification of epitopes derived from Zika (ZIKV), Chikungunya (CHIKV) viruses following natural infection and vaccination75N93019C00065 · NIAID · LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY · PI MITCHELL, MAYA · 2019 to 2023
$7.3M
Gates Foundation INV-021239NIAID NIH HHS 75N93019C00065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Production of affordable coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in low- and lower-middle-income countries is needed. NDV-HXP-S is an inactivated egg-based recombinant Newcastle disease virus vaccine expressing the spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A public sector manufacturer in Vietnam assessed the immunogenicity of NDV-HXP-S (COVIVAC) relative to an authorized vaccine. This phase 2 stage of a randomised, observer-blind, controlled, phase 1/2 trial was conducted at three community health centers in Thai Binh Province, Vietnam. Healthy males and non-pregnant females, 18 years of age and older, were eligible. Participants were randomised by age (18-59, ≥60 years) to receive one of three treatments by intramuscular injection twice, 28 days apart: COVIVAC at 3 μg or 6 μg, or AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine VAXZEVRIA™. Participants and personnel assessing outcomes were masked to treatment. The vaccine dose was selected based on Phase 1 results. A 6 μg dose was chosen to explore the immunogenicity gain over the 3-μg dose. The study's aim is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of COVIVAC at two dose levels compared to VAXZEVRIA, the most commonly used COVID-19 vaccine in Vietnam. The main outcome was the induction of 50% neutralising antibody titers against vaccine-homologous pseudotyped virus 14 days (day 43) and 6 months (day 197) after the second vaccination by age group. The primary immunogenicity and safety analyses included all participants who received one dose of the vaccine. ClinicalTrials.govNCT05940194. During August 10-23, 2021, 737 individuals were screened, and 374 were randomised (124-125 per group); all subjects received vaccine dose one and all but three received doses two four weeks later. Subjects 18-59 years of age achieved the following geometric mean titers of PNA 14 days after vaccine dose two: 153⋅28 (95 % CI 124·2-189⋅15) for COVIVAC 3 μg, 176⋅2 (95 % CI 141⋅45-220.27) for COVIVAC 6 μg, and 99⋅92(95 % CI 80.80-123⋅56) for VAXZEVRIA. Subjects ≥60 years of age also achieved potent geometric mean titers of PNA at the same timepoint: 183⋅57 (95 % CI 133.4-252⋅61) for COVIVAC 3 μg, 257⋅87 (95 % CI 181⋅6-367⋅18) for COVIVAC 6 μg, and 79⋅49(95 % CI 55⋅68-113⋅4) for VAXZEVRIA. On day 43, the geometric mean fold rise of 50 % neutralising antibody titers for subjects age 18-59 years was 31·20 (COVIVAC 3 μg N = 82, 95 % CI 25·14-38·74), 35·80 (COVIVAC 6 μg; N = 83, 95 % CI 29·03-44·15), 18·85 (VAXZEVRIA; N = 82, 95 % CI 15·10-23·54), and for subjects age ≥ 60 years was 37·27 (COVIVAC 3 μg; N = 42, 95 % CI 27·43-50·63), 50·10 (COVIVAC 6 μg; N = 40, 95 % CI 35·46-70·76), 16·11 (VAXZEVRIA; N = 40, 95 % CI 11·73-22·13). Among subjects seronegative for anti-S IgG at baseline, the day 43 geometric mean titer ratio of neutralising antibody (COVIVC 6 μg/VAXZEVRIA) was 1·77 (95 % CI 1·30-2·40) for subjects age 18-59 years and 3·24 (95 % CI 1·98-5·32) for subjects age ≥ 60 years. On day 197, the age-specific ratios were 1·11 (95 % CI 0·51-2·43) and 2·32 (0·69-7·85). Vaccines were well tolerated; reactogenicity was predominantly mild and transient. The percentage of subjects with unsolicited adverse events (AEs) during 28 days after vaccinations was similar among treatments (COVIVAC 3 μg 29·0 %, COVIVAC 6 μg 23·2 %, VAXZEVRIA 31·2 %); no vaccine-related AE was reported. Considering that induction of neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 has been correlated with the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, including VAXZEVRIA, our results suggest that vaccination with COVIVAC may afford clinical benefit matching or exceeding that of the VAXZEVRIA vaccine. ClinicalTrials.govNCT05940194.

Indexed as

Antibodies, NeutralizingCOVID-19 VaccinesNewcastle disease virusSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVaccines, InactivatedVaccines, SyntheticAdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19FemaleHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Vaccines, InactivatedVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID39615342
PMCPMC11672239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.