ReviewJournal of electrocardiology
Tracking autonomic nervous system activity using surface ECG: Personalized, multiparametric evaluation.
Review in Journal of electrocardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Power of Head-Up Tilt Test Enhanced by Autonomic ECG Parameters and Beat-to-Beat Hemodynamic Monitoring.Cardiology research and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present a concise review of the background, pitfalls, and potential solutions for the noninvasive evaluation and continuous tracking of cardiac autonomic nervous system activity (ANSA), using surface-ECG-accessible parameters, including heart rate (HR), heart-rate variability (HRV), and cardiac repolarization. These parameters have provided insights into the dynamics of cardiac ANSA in controlled experiments and have proved useful in risk assessment with respect to sudden cardiac death and all-cause mortality in some patient populations, as well as in implantable device programming. Yet attempts to translate these parameters from the laboratory environment to ambulatory settings have been hampered by the presence of multiple uncontrolled factors, including changes in blood pressure, body position, physical activity, and respiration frequency. We show that a single-parameter-based, simplified cardiac ANSA evaluation in an uncontrolled ambulatory setting could be inaccurate, and we discuss several approaches to improve accuracy. Discerning cardiac ANSA effects in uncontrolled ambulatory environments requires tracking multiple physiological processes, preferably using multisensor, multiparametric monitoring and controlling some physiological variables (e.g., respiration frequency); data fusion and machine-learning-based analytics are instrumental for developing more accurate personalized ANSA evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.