ArticleJournal of communication disorders
Characterizing drug-induced stuttering in electronic health records.
Article in Journal of communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges and Opportunities in Characterizing the Genetics of Stuttering: From Sample Acquisition to Functional Interpretation of the Genome.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Review
- Analysis of ADR reports of cetuximab based on the FDA adverse event reporting system database.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDrug-induced stuttering is a phenomenon where the onset of stuttered speech is caused by exposure to pharmaceutical chemical substances. This acquired form of stuttering features many of the same overt speech behaviors as developmental stuttering. Investigations of drug-induced stuttering have been limited to adverse drug reaction reports and case studies. This study leveraged electronic health records (EHRs) at a major university medical center to identify drug-induced stuttering within medical notes, followed by classification of implicated drug types.
methodsA previous systematic EHR review of approximately 3 million individuals to identify cases of developmental stuttering resulted in 40 suspected cases of drug-induced stuttering. In the present study, these cases were reviewed comprehensively to evaluate: name, class, and mechanism of action of suspected drug, level of evidence for the implicated drug as a causal agent, therapeutic measures taken, and progression or remission of stuttering.
resultsEighteen different drugs were linked to possible drug-induced stuttering in 22 individuals. Antiseizure agents, CNS stimulants, and antidepressants were the most common drug classes implicated in drug-induced stuttering. topiramate (Topamax) was the most commonly implicated drug across all records reviewed.
conclusionsThis study represents the first analysis of health system data examining drugs implicated in drug-induced stuttering in a clinical setting. Augmenting previous case reports and database reviews, a variety of drugs were identified; however, improved reporting of drug-associated speech fluency changes within the EHR are needed to further amass evidence for suspected drugs and their associated epidemiological and clinical characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.