Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39615057›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2025

Efficient development of subject-specific finite element knee models: Automated identification of soft-tissue attachments.

Vahid Malbouby, Kalin D Gibbons, Nurbanu Bursa, Amanda K Ivy, Clare K Fitzpatrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Rapid personalized computational modeling of the wrist.Medical engineering & physics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Validating subject-specific knee models fromFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vahid MalboubyMechanical and Biomedical Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States.
Kalin D GibbonsMechanical and Biomedical Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States.
Nurbanu BursaBiomedical Research Institute, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States.
Amanda K IvyMechanical and Biomedical Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States.
Clare K FitzpatrickMechanical and Biomedical Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States. Electronic address: clarefitzpatrick@boisestate.edu.

Funding

VPS35 D620N inhibits autophagy through disrupted hyaluronic acid-CD44 signalingP20GM109095 · NIGMS · BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI OCHOA-REPARAZ, JAVIER · 2014 to 2023
$22.7M
Center of Biomedical Research Excellence in Matrix Biology Phase 3P30GM154497 · NIGMS · BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Katherine J Johnson · 2024 to 2026
$4.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109095NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM154497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Musculoskeletal disorders impact quality of life and incur substantial socio-economic costs. While in vivo and in vitro studies provide valuable insights, they are often limited by invasiveness and logistical constraints. Finite element (FE) analysis offers a non-invasive, cost-effective alternative for studying joint mechanics. This study introduces a fully automated algorithm for identifying soft-tissue attachment sites to streamline the creation of subject-specific FE knee models from magnetic resonance images. Twelve knees were selected from the Osteoarthritis Initiative database and segmented to create 3D meshes of bone and cartilage. Attachment sites were identified in three conditions: manually by two evaluators and via our automated Python-based algorithm. All knees underwent FE simulations of a 90° flexion-extension cycle, and 68 kinematic, force, contact, stress and strain outputs were extracted. The automated process was compared against manual identification to assess intra-operator variability. The attachment site locations were consistent across all three conditions, with average distances of 3.0 ± 0.5 to 3.1 ± 0.6 mm and no significant differences between conditions (p = 0.90). FE outputs were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients, randomized mean square error, and pairwise dynamic time warping in conjunction with ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis. There were no statistical differences in pairwise comparisons of 67 of 68 FE output variables, demonstrating the automated method's consistency with manual identification. Our automated approach significantly reduces processing time from hours to seconds, facilitating large-scale studies and enhancing reproducibility in biomechanical research. This advancement holds promise for broader clinical and research applications, supporting the efficient development of personalized musculoskeletal models.

Indexed as

Finite Element AnalysisKnee JointAgedAlgorithmsBiomechanical PhenomenaCartilage, ArticularFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalAutomatedFinite elementKneeLigament attachmentsSubject-specific modeling

Identifiers

PMID39615057
PMCPMC11637895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.