ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026
Actigraphy-derived multidimensional sleep health among breast cancer survivors and controls: Pink SWAN.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multidimensional Sleep Health and Sleep Environment Factors in Individuals with Cancer Undergoing Outpatient Chemotherapy: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Analysis.Nature and science of sleep · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare breast cancer survivors (BCS) to women without breast cancer (controls) on sleep health risk factors and actigraphy-derived dimensions of sleep (duration, maintenance, timing, and regularity) and examine whether the effect of breast cancer on sleep differs by time since diagnosis.
methodsAnalyses included data from 68 BCS and 1042 controls who participated in actigraphy and Pink SWAN sub-studies within the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation. BCS and control characteristics were compared using chi-square, Fisher's exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Sleep measures were regressed onto breast cancer status using binomial logistic and linear regression. The interaction between BCS status and years since diagnosis (< 5; ≥ 5) was tested in these models before and after covariate adjustment.
resultsThere were no overall sleep differences between BCS and controls; both groups experienced poor sleep health on average across multiple dimensions. Physical inactivity, sleep apnea, and vasomotor and depressive symptoms were associated with worse sleep in both groups. Total sleep time was lower among BCS than controls within 5 years of diagnosis (6.13 vs. 6.57 h; p = .03) but did not differ at > 5 years post-diagnosis (6.59 vs. 6.45 h; p = .32). BCS reported greater use of exogenous hormones (p < .0001) and were twice as likely to have initiated anxiolytic use post-diagnosis (p = .03).
conclusionsBCS within 5 years of diagnosis experienced shorter sleep duration than controls but did not differ on other sleep parameters. Both groups experienced poor sleep health. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: BCS and similarly-aged women experience poor sleep health requiring assessment and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.