ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2024
Dirty habits: potential for spread of antibiotic-resistance by black-headed gulls from waste-water treatment plants.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Migratory Birds in the Dissemination of Antimicrobial Resistance: A One Health Perspective.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Conflicts hinder research into animal movements.Ambio · 2026Article
- From ecology to evolution: plasmid- and colicin-mediated persistence of antibiotic-resistantmSystems · 2026Article
- Opportunistic Gulls Infected by Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Show Contrasting Movement Behaviour.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anthropogenic environments such as wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and landfills are sources of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Black-headed gulls (Chroicocephalus ridibundus) frequently use WWTPs and may be vectors for AMR. We used GPS tracking data for 39 gulls for up to 8 months, combined with a shedding curve, to study sources and dispersal distances of AMR in Iberia. The gulls used 21 different WWTPs (684 visits) and three landfills (21 visits). Areas of high risk of AMR dissemination were an average of 25 km from the infection source, with a maximum of 500 km. Solar saltworks and natural waterbodies were particularly exposed to AMR dissemination, followed by agriculture, sports facilities, and tourist beaches. There was important variability between individual gulls in their habitat specialization, and which WWTPs they visited. Studying the spatial movements of gulls after visiting WWTPs and landfills helps pinpoint sensitive locations where pathogen transmission is most likely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.