ArticleNeurosurgical review2024
Clinical features and outcomes of basilar invagination.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Basilar invagination has been classified into two types by Goel: Type A is defined mechanical instability of the atlantoaxial joint with upward displacement of the odontoid process while Type B is characterized by stable atlantoaxial joints. This study reviews the association between radiological features and symptomatology and prognosis of two types of basilar invagination for better clinical management. A retrospective analysis was conducted including 141 patients diagnosed with basilar invagination who underwent surgical treatment from January 2016 to December 2020. The neurological function was assessed by the JOA scores, and Short-Form 12 scores. Logistic univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to predict prognostic risk factors. Type A patients (21/101, 20.8%) with more cases of dizziness, lower preoperative JOA scores and SF-12 PCS scores (JOA, 13.0 vs. 13.9, P = 0.042; SF-12 PCS, 37.48 vs. 38.42, P = 0.034) compared to type B (2/40, 5%) (P = 0.022). Type B (22/40, 55%) with more cases of ataxia than type A (35/101, 34.7%) (P = 0.026). Patients with type B demonstrated a significantly higher improvement rate in SF-12 PCS than type A (P = 0.018). Further logistic regression revealed that onset age ≥ 45 years (OR 4.654, 95% CI 1.645-13.165; p = 0.004) and basal angle ≥ 125° (OR 28.139, 95% CI 1.090-726.239; p = 0.044) were independent risk factors for type A and type B, respectively. Type A patients with more cases of dizziness, and type B patients with more cases of ataxia, can achieve better long-term prognosis following clinical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39614995What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.