Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39614980›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2025

Identifying key factors for recurrence of genetic disorder: insights from Indian families with multiple affected children.

Kriti Menon, Vani Agarwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kriti MenonApollo Genomics institutes Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India. kriti_m@apollohospitals.com.
Vani AgarwalApollo Genomics institutes Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the factors contributing to the recurrence of severe genetic conditions in multiple children of the same couple, focusing on a cohort of 26 families who had more than one child affected by the same genetic disorder. Conducted at a genetic clinic in India, the study employed a qualitative methodology guided by COREQ guidelines, using semi-structured interviews to explore the interplay of individual beliefs, healthcare provider practices, and systemic healthcare inefficiencies. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using a combination of content analysis and grounded theory, which allowed for the identification of recurrent themes and emerging ideas. The study found that strong religious and cultural beliefs often led families to disregard medical advice, contributing to the recurrence of genetic conditions. Additionally, significant gaps in healthcare provider knowledge and inadequate reproductive counseling were identified as critical barriers to timely diagnosis and prevention of recurrence. Another major theme was the inherent complexities of genetic diseases and genetic testing, where variable expression of conditions, delayed symptom onset, and limitations of genetic tests themselves often prevented early diagnosis and intervention. This research highlights the need for improved genetic literacy among healthcare providers, culturally sensitive counseling, and better integration of genetic services into the broader healthcare system. By addressing these barriers, the risk of recurrence can be significantly reduced, improving patient outcomes and family well-being. This study is one of the few in India to analyze such factors and underscore the critical need for targeted interventions at multiple levels.

Indexed as

Genetic counselingGenetic testingRare disordersRecessive disordersRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID39614980
PMCPMC11950496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.