Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39614959›Full record

SynthesisSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2024

Artificial intelligence facial recognition of obstructive sleep apnea: a Bayesian meta-analysis.

Esther Yanxin Gao, Benjamin Kye Jyn Tan, Nicole Kye Wen Tan, Adele Chin Wei Ng, Zhou Hao Leong, Chu Qin Phua, Shaun Ray Han Loh, Maythad Uataya, Liang Chye Goh, Thun How Ong and 3 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Awake speech recordings for machine learning diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea: a Bayesian meta-analysis.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Esther Yanxin Gao *Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital (SGH), Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2311-7845
Benjamin Kye Jyn Tan *Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital (SGH), Singapore, Singapore. benjamintankyejyn@u.nus.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9411-6164
Nicole Kye Wen TanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2597-9142
Adele Chin Wei NgDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital (SGH), Singapore, Singapore.
Zhou Hao LeongDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital (SGH), Singapore, Singapore.
Chu Qin PhuaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Shaun Ray Han LohDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital (SGH), Singapore, Singapore.
Maythad UatayaSiriraj Piyamaharajkarun Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Liang Chye GohDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-3059-7253
Thun How OngSingHealth Duke-NUS Sleep Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Leong Chai LeowSingHealth Duke-NUS Sleep Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Guang-Bin HuangSchool of Automation, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2480-4965
Song Tar TohDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital (SGH), Singapore, Singapore. toh.song.tar@singhealth.com.sg.ORCID 0000-0003-2077-2457

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeConventional obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosis via polysomnography can be costly and inaccessible. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled the use of craniofacial photographs to diagnose OSA. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the diagnostic accuracy of this innovative approach.

methodsTwo blinded reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases, then selected and graded the risk of bias of observational studies of adults (≥ 18 years) comparing the diagnostic performance of AI algorithms using craniofacial photographs, versus conventional OSA diagnostic criteria (i.e. apnea-hypopnea index [AHI]). Studies were excluded if they detected apneic events without diagnosing OSA. AI models evaluated with a random split test set or k-fold cross-validation were included in a Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis.

resultsFrom 5,147 records, 6 studies were included, containing 10 AI models trained/tested on 1,417/983 participants. The risk of bias was low. AI trained on craniofacial photographs achieved a pooled 84.9% sensitivity (95% credible interval [95% CrI]: 77.1-90.7%) and 71.2% specificity (95% CrI: 60.7-81.4%). Bayesian meta-regression identified deep learning (convolutional neural networks) as the most accurate AI algorithm (91.1% sensitivity, 79.2% specificity) comparable to home sleep apnea tests. AHI cutoffs, OSA prevalence, feature engineering, input data, camera type and informativeness of Bayesian prior did not alter diagnostic accuracy. There was no substantial publication bias.

conclusionAI trained on craniofacial photographs have high diagnostic accuracy and should be considered as a low-cost OSA screening tool. Future work focused on deep learning using smartphone images could improve the feasibility of this approach in primary care.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBayes TheoremSleep Apnea, ObstructiveAutomated Facial RecognitionHumansPolysomnographyDeep learningDiagnostic test accuracyMachine learningNeural networksSleep disordered breathingSnoring

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.