SynthesisSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2024
Artificial intelligence facial recognition of obstructive sleep apnea: a Bayesian meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosing Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using Photoplethysmography: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using Overnight Pulse Oximetry: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Awake speech recordings for machine learning diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea: a Bayesian meta-analysis.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Electrocardiogram heart rate variability for machine learning diagnosis of obstructive sleep Apnoea: A bayesian meta-analysis.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Three-class obstructive sleep apnea severity assessment: a parallel AHI and ODI explainable artificial intelligence framework using craniofacial-enriched clinical data.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Article
- An Exploration of Craniofacial Features in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using the Explainable Deep Learning Approaches.Nature and science of sleep · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in AI-Driven Mobile Health Enhancing Healthcare-Narrative Insights into Latest Progress.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeConventional obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosis via polysomnography can be costly and inaccessible. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled the use of craniofacial photographs to diagnose OSA. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the diagnostic accuracy of this innovative approach.
methodsTwo blinded reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases, then selected and graded the risk of bias of observational studies of adults (≥ 18 years) comparing the diagnostic performance of AI algorithms using craniofacial photographs, versus conventional OSA diagnostic criteria (i.e. apnea-hypopnea index [AHI]). Studies were excluded if they detected apneic events without diagnosing OSA. AI models evaluated with a random split test set or k-fold cross-validation were included in a Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis.
resultsFrom 5,147 records, 6 studies were included, containing 10 AI models trained/tested on 1,417/983 participants. The risk of bias was low. AI trained on craniofacial photographs achieved a pooled 84.9% sensitivity (95% credible interval [95% CrI]: 77.1-90.7%) and 71.2% specificity (95% CrI: 60.7-81.4%). Bayesian meta-regression identified deep learning (convolutional neural networks) as the most accurate AI algorithm (91.1% sensitivity, 79.2% specificity) comparable to home sleep apnea tests. AHI cutoffs, OSA prevalence, feature engineering, input data, camera type and informativeness of Bayesian prior did not alter diagnostic accuracy. There was no substantial publication bias.
conclusionAI trained on craniofacial photographs have high diagnostic accuracy and should be considered as a low-cost OSA screening tool. Future work focused on deep learning using smartphone images could improve the feasibility of this approach in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39614959What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.