ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025
Embryology outcomes of a device-based sperm separation technique compared to density gradient centrifugation using thawed spermatozoa-a sibling donor oocyte study.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Timing Matters? Impact of Early Sperm Processing on Motile Sperm Recovery, Fertilization, Blastocyst Rate, and Pregnancy Outcomes in IUI and IVF.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A Narrative Review on the Sperm Selection Methods in Assisted Reproductive Technology: Out with the New, the Old Is Better?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate whether the ZyMōt™ Multi 850 μl sperm separation device (SSD) effectively recovers motile spermatozoa from cryopreserved ejaculates and compare its effect on key embryology outcomes including fertilization, cleavage stage, and total and top-quality blastocyst formation rates to the traditional Density Gradient Centrifugation (DGC) method.
methodsIn this prospective, single-center, controlled study, we used fresh sibling donor oocytes and non-donor cryopreserved ejaculates. In total, 150 couples participated in this study. At least eight MII donor oocytes were allocated to each couple split into two arms. One arm underwent ICSI with the control DGC-processed sample, and the other arm processed with SSD.
resultsNo significant difference on fertilization and cleavage stage embryo rates was observed between the two techniques. We observed a significant increase in the percentage of total (SSD: 74.03 ± 23.47% vs. DGC: 67.86 ± 23.92%; p = 0.016) and top-quality (SSD: 66.38 ± 24.94% vs. DGC: 60.98 ± 24.40%; p = 0.035) blastocysts formed post-SSD processing. Sub-analysis showed that this increase remained significant for the WHO-normal group (n = 118), but not for the WHO-abnormal group (n = 32).
conclusionThe SSD was successfully applied in all 150 cases, providing adequate numbers of spermatozoa to undergo ICSI. Additionally, SSD significantly improved blastocyst development rates; however, this was of limited clinical impact considering the minor improvement on the average number of top-quality blastocysts. It can be hypothesized that this positive contribution may be stronger and clinically significant when a larger number of oocytes is used or in homologous oocyte ICSI cycles, where the repair mechanisms of the oocytes may insufficient for promoting healthy embryo development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.