ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2024
Comparative evaluation of the upper pharyngeal airway among children with/without UCLP and with/without OSA.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Palatal Morphology and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity in Children with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A CBCT Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Investigating anatomical determinants of OSA in children with UCLP: insights into tongue, airway, and hyoid bone.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Article
- Pharyngeal Airway Architecture in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate by Cone-beam Computed Tomography: Review of Literature.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025Article
- Age- and Gender-Based Tongue Volume Variations on Asymptomatic Patients: A Simplified Approach to Form Baseline Data for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- CBCT analysis of pharyngeal airway dimensions in cleft lip and palate: A systematic review and meta-analysis.National journal of maxillofacial surgeryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the volume and the most constricted cross-sectional area (lumen) sizes of the upper pharyngeal airway among children with/without unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and with/without obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
methodsThis prospective study was conducted on 66 Thai children aged 5 to 12 years, encompassing demographic information, polysomnographic data, and sex distribution: 34 with non-syndromic UCLP (16 with OSA; 18 without OSA) and 32 non-cleft children (16 with OSA; 16 without OSA). Subjects were divided into two age groups: preadolescent group (ages 10-12) and younger group (ages 5-9). Cone-beam computed tomography images were acquired with subjects in a supine position. Subsequent measurements were conducted using the Dolphin imaging program (version 11.7 premium) to investigate and compare the volumes and lumens of the nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal airways.
resultsIn the younger group, the UCLP with OSA group exhibited significantly smaller volumes and lumens in the oropharyngeal airway compared to the non-cleft group without OSA (volume: p = 0.044; lumen: p = 0.031, 95% CI). All upper pharyngeal airway parts had comparable volumes and lumens between age groups. However, preadolescence reported no significant differences.
conclusionsStatistically significant differences were observed only in the oropharyngeal airway measurements in the younger sample compared to the adolescent sample. This underscores the importance of considering oropharyngeal airway structure in diagnosing and preventing OSA in children. However, it is essential to note that while airway size is a fundamental factor, it may not be the sole determinant of OSA occurrence. Other factors likely contribute to the condition as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39614951What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.