Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39614916›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024

Albumin-muscle density score predicts overall survival in patients with hepatocellular cancer undergoing treatment with transarterial chemoembolization.

Alexey Surov, Andreas Wienke, Jan Borggrefe, Timo Alexander Auer, Bernhard Gebauer, Aline Mähringer-Kunz, Felix Nensa, Johannes Haubold, Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt, René Hosch and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Alexey Surov *Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Wesling University Hospital Minden, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. alexey.surov@gmx.de.
Andreas Wienke *Department of Radiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jan BorggrefeDepartment of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Wesling University Hospital Minden, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Timo Alexander AuerInstitute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Martin-Luther- University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Bernhard GebauerInstitute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Martin-Luther- University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Aline Mähringer-KunzDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckst. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Felix NensaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Johannes HauboldDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Benedikt Michael SchaarschmidtDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
René HoschDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Jens KleesiekDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Thierno D DialloDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Freiburg University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany.
Natascha RoehlenDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Freiburg University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany.
Dominik BettingerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Freiburg University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany.
Michel EisenblätterDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Verena SteinleDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Philipp MayerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
David ZopfsDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Daniel Pinto Dos SantosDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Lukas Müller *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckst. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Roman Kloeckner *Department for Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the present study was to analyze associations between different skeletal muscle quality parameters and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing treatment with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 784 treatment-naïve patients with HCC undergoing TACE at six tertiary care centers between 2010 and 2020. Intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) were estimated. Myosteatosis was defined as SMD < 28.0 HU for men and < 23.8 HU for women. Furthermore, albumin-SMD score (ADS) was calculated as follows: serum albumin (g/dL) × SMD (HU). To assess the impact of muscle quality on survival, Cox regression model was used. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis. Parameters of skeletal muscle quality were compared in univariate and multivariate regression analyses, adjusted for established risk factors.

resultsIn the overall sample, survivors had higher SMD and ADS in comparison to non-survivors. Patients with low ADS had a lower OS than patients with high ADS (8.4 vs. 14.3 months, p < 0.001). In alcohol-induced HCC, none of the analyzed parameters of muscle quality influenced survival. In viral induced HCC, patients with low ADS had lower OS than patients with high ADS (8.8 vs. 15.7 months, p < 0.001). In patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), none of the analyzed parameters of muscle quality influenced survival.

conclusionsLow ADS is an independent predictor of worse OS in patients with viral-induced HCC undergoing treatment with TACE. In alcohol-induced and NASH-induced HCCs, parameters of muscle quality do not influence OS.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsMuscle, SkeletalAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSerum AlbuminSurvival RateSerum AlbuminHepatocellular cancerSkeletal musculatureSurvivalTransarterial chemoembolization

Identifiers

PMID39614916
PMCPMC11608168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.