Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39614758›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2025

American Geriatrics Society position statement: Making medical treatment decisions for unrepresented older adults.

Joseph D Dixon, Aruna V Josyula, Noelle Marie Javier, Yael Zweig, Mriganka Singh, Luke Kim, Niranjan Thothala, Timothy W Farrell

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Surrogate Decision-Making in Carceral Healthcare.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joseph D DixonDivision of Geriatric & Palliative Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Aruna V JosyulaCentral Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, Texas, USA.
Noelle Marie JavierBrookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Yael ZweigDivision of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Mriganka SinghDivision of Geriatrics & Palliative Medicine, Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-3337-7207
Luke KimCenter for Geriatric Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2396-4868
Niranjan ThothalaGood Samaritan Hospital, Vincennes, Indiana, USA.
Timothy W FarrellDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0070-8757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper is an official position statement of the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) and updates the 2017 AGS position statement, Making Medical Treatment Decisions for Unbefriended Older Adults. In this updated position statement, the term "unbefriended" is replaced by "unrepresented" as a term that is more value-neutral, more accurately describes the circumstance in which a person without medical decision-making capacity does not have recognized surrogate representation, and better aligns with increasingly preferred terminology as reflected in recent medical literature. We define unrepresented older adults as those who (1) lack decisional capacity to provide informed consent for a particular medical treatment, (2) have not executed an advance directive that addresses the medical treatment at hand and lack capacity to do so, and (3) lack representation from a surrogate decision-maker (i.e., family, friend, or legally authorized surrogate). Making medical decisions on behalf of unrepresented older adults is exceptionally challenging and, given demographic trends, is likely to become increasingly common in the years ahead. The process of arriving at treatment decisions for this population should follow standards of procedural fairness and include capacity assessment, search for potential surrogates, team-based efforts to determine the patient's values and preferences, and steps to guard against bias. Proactive measures are needed to identify older adults at risk for becoming unrepresented. This position statement also calls for national efforts to reduce state-to-state variability in legal approaches for unrepresented patients.

Indexed as

Decision MakingGeriatricsInformed ConsentMental CompetencyAdvance DirectivesAgedAged, 80 and overHumansSocieties, MedicalUnited Statesadult orphanolder adultssurrogate decision‐makerunbefriendedunrepresented

Identifiers

PMID39614758
PMCPMC12100688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.