Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39614713›Full record

ArticleJournal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association2025

Flange Size Matters: A Comparative Pilot Study of the Flange FITS

Lisa A Anders, Jeanette Mesite Frem, Thomas P McCoy

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisa A AndersAssistant Professor, University of North Carolina at Greensboro School of Nursing, Greensboro, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9859-9522
Jeanette Mesite FremLactation Consultant, Babies in Common, Northborough, MA, USA.
Thomas P McCoyClinical Professor, Statistician, University of North Carolina at Greensboro School of Nursing, Greensboro, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPumping is a common practice in the United States, but it can be uncomfortable and lead to concerns about milk supply. The fit of the flange, or breast shield, used while pumping can contribute to or alleviate these problems. Flanges are available in a wide variety of sizes, and there are inconsistencies in guidance provided by healthcare providers and pump manufacturers for parents choosing a size. There have been no studies comparing different methods of sizing in terms of comfort and milk output. RESEARCH

aimsThe aim of this research was to examine differences in milk output and comfort using two methods of flange sizing.

methodA within-subject cross-over design with a convenience sample of parents exclusively feeding their own human milk was used to compare comfort and milk yield between using smaller-fit and standard-fit flanges. Participants pumped for 1 week with each set of flanges and recorded milk output and comfort outcome measures. Data were collected on participant demographics, nipple measurements, and flange sizes used.

resultsWhen compared to the newer small-size fitting, participants using the standard fit flanges had significantly less milk output (mean difference = -15.0 g, 95% CI [-25.0, -5.0],

conclusionFlange fitting is a process that should be individualized to the patient and may require a trial of one or more sizes during a pumping session. Smaller sizes determined using this individualized process and starting with nipple tip measurement may be used without compromising milk output or comfort.

Indexed as

Breast Milk ExpressionEquipment DesignAdultCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMilk, HumanPilot Projectsbreastfeedingbreastfeeding experiencebreast pumpinghuman milkhuman milk expressionlactation

Identifiers

PMID39614713
PMCPMC11829504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.