Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39614695›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025

Evaluating predictive values of umbilical cord arterial lactate for adverse newborn outcomes among term-births in northern Uganda: A cross sectional analytical study.

Elizabeth Ayebare, James K Tumwine, Jolly Nankunda, Anna Hjelmstedt, Wibke Jonas, Grace Ndeezi, Nicola Orsini, Claudia Hanson

Abstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluating predictive values of umbilical cord arterial lactate for adverse newborn outcomes among term-births in northern Uganda: A cross sectional analytical study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth AyebareDepartment of Nursing, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5636-5258
James K TumwineDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Kabale University, Kabale, Uganda.
Jolly NankundaDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Kabale University, Kabale, Uganda.
Anna HjelmstedtDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Wibke JonasDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Grace NdeeziDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Kabale University, Kabale, Uganda.
Nicola OrsiniDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Claudia HansonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Einhorn Family FoundationMakerere-Sweden Bilateral Research Program 5180060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBirth asphyxia is one of the leading causes of death for neonates worldwide. Lack of an objective cost effective test to predict poor newborn outcomes at birth affects the ability to respond appropriately. This study determined predictive values of umbilical cord arterial lactate in relation to adverse neonatal outcomes.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional analytical study conducted between March 2018 and March 2019 at two hospitals in Northern Uganda. A total of 2655 women admitted for birth and their newborns were recruited. At birth, umbilical cord arterial blood was tested for lactate using the Nova Biomedical StatStrip Xpress meter. Apgar scores were assessed at 5 min by trained research midwives. Area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUROC) was calculated relating umbilical arterial lactate (UAL) levels and four outcomes. We modeled the best lactate cutoff level associated with the highest AUROC for the four outcomes.

resultsThe estimated AUROC for lactate was: 88.42% for Apgar score <7 at 5 min, 83.35% for resuscitation with bag and mask, 84.55% for oxygen therapy after resuscitation and 87.72% for admission to neonatal care unit. The UAL cutoff value of 5.5 mmol/L was associated with the best AUROC of between 75.81% to 81.75% for the four adverse outcomes with no significant differences when adjusted for infectious disease parameters. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were; 78.95%, 86.48%, 23.54%, and 98.73% for Apgar scores <7 at 5 min, 64.40%, 88.11%, 36.59%, and 95.87% for resuscitation with bag and mask, 67.17%, 87.20%, 30.23%, and 96.99% for oxygen therapy after resuscitation, and 77.17%, 86.15%, 22.27%, and 98.65% for admission to the special care unit, respectively.

conclusionUmbilical cord lactate point-of-care (POC) estimate of ≥5.5 mmol/L predicts adverse neonatal outcomes. This test may be used to trigger early interventions and intensified neonatal care complementing the clinical Apgar score assessment in settings like Uganda.

Indexed as

Asphyxia NeonatorumLactic AcidPoint-of-Care TestingUmbilical ArteriesApgar ScoreArea Under CurveCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care, NeonatalMaleOxygen Inhalation TherapyPatient AdmissionPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyLactic Acidbirth asphyxianewbornspoint‐of‐care testUganda

Identifiers

PMID39614695
PMCPMC11911978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.