ReviewOrphanet journal of rare diseases2024
The development for emerging biomarkers of lymphangioleiomyomatosis.
Review in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human blood cell traits and sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis: results from mediation joint multi-omics and eQTL Mendelian randomization analysis.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- CCL14, identified by multi-omics approach, serves as a novel indicator of disease severity and progression in lymphangioleiomyomatosis.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Exhaled Breath Analysis in Lymphangioleiomyomatosis by Real-Time Proton Mass Spectrometry.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Novel treatment strategies for lymphangioleiomyomatosis: a narrative review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a rare, slowly progressing, low-grade metastatic tumor primarily affecting women. Currently, vascular endothelial growth factor-D (VEGF-D) is the only validated diagnostic biomarker, enabling diagnosis of LAM without the need for lung biopsy in appropriate clinical settings. However, VEGF-D concentrations are normal in about 30% of patients, rendering it insufficient for diagnosing all cases of LAM. There remains a need to identify more non-invasive, safe, sensitive, and specific biomarkers associated with LAM. Therefore, it is imperative to explore novel non-invasive, safe, and specific diagnostic methods for LAM. This article aims to review biomarkers associated with LAM, including potential biomarkers newly discovered or showing advancements in classical biomarkers widely used in LAM, and discuss their application in LAM diagnosis, assessment of disease severity, prediction of treatment response, and prognosis. （LAM） 、，。，-D （VEGF-D） ， LAM。， 30% VEGF-D ， LAM 。 LAM 、、。，、 LAM 。 LAM ， LAM ， LAM 、、。.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.