Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39614347›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2024

Psychological interventions for internalized weight stigma: a systematic scoping review of feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy.

Laura D'Adamo, Abigail T Shonrock, Lawrence Monocello, Jake Goldberg, Lauren H Yaeger, Rebecca L Pearl, Denise E Wilfley

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura D'AdamoDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science (WELL Center), Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. Lad374@drexel.edu.
Abigail T ShonrockDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Lawrence MonocelloDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Jake GoldbergDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Lauren H YaegerBecker Medical Library, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Rebecca L PearlDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Denise E WilfleyDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

Washington University Nutrition Obesity Research CenterP30DK056341 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Dominic N Reeds · 1999 to 2026
$30.2M
WUSTL Transdisciplinary Pre- and Postdoctoral Training Program in Obesity and Cardiovascular DiseaseT32HL130357 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WILFLEY, DENISE ELLA · 2016 to 2025
$4.3M
Investigating the relationship between internalized weight stigma and metabolic syndromeR03HL160603 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PEARL, REBECCA L · 2022 to 2023
$153k
Dynamic relations between interpersonal stressors, affective states, and binge eating in adolescent girlsF31MH138068 · NIMH · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI D'ADAMO, LAURA · 2024 to 2025
$99k
NHLBI NIH HHS R03 HL160603NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056341NIH HHS F31MH138068NIH HHS R03HL160603NIH HHS T32HL130357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternalized weight stigma (IWS) is highly prevalent and associated with deleterious mental and physical health outcomes. Initiatives are needed to address IWS and promote effective coping and resilience among individuals who are exposed to weight stigma. We conducted a systematic scoping review of the literature on psychological interventions for IWS and explored their intervention components, feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy at reducing IWS and related negative physiological and psychological health outcomes.

methodsEight databases were searched. Inclusion criteria included: (1) Psychological intervention; (2) Published in English; and (3) Included IWS as an outcome. Exclusion criteria included: (1) Commentary or review; and (2) Not a psychological intervention. A narrative review framework was used to synthesize results.

resultsOf 161 articles screened, 20 were included. Included interventions demonstrated high feasibility, acceptability, and engagement overall. Sixteen of 20 included studies observed significant reductions in IWS that were maintained over follow-up periods, yet data on whether interventions produced greater reductions than control conditions were mixed. Studies observed significant improvements in numerous physical and mental health outcomes.

conclusionsFindings suggest that existing interventions are feasible, acceptable, and may provide meaningful improvements in IWS and associated health outcomes, highlighting the potential for psychological interventions to promote improved health and wellbeing in individuals with IWS. High-quality studies using rigorous study designs (e.g., randomized controlled trials) are needed to further evaluate the efficacy of interventions for IWS.

Indexed as

Body imageInternalized weight stigmaPsychological interventionWeightWeight bias

Identifiers

PMID39614347
PMCPMC11607863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.