Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39614321›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2024

Transcatheter bicuspid venous valve prostheses: fluid mechanical performance testing of artificial nonwoven leaflets.

Andreas Götz, Sabine Illner, Nicklas Fiedler, Julia Schubert, Jan Oldenburg, Heinz Müller, Wolfram Schmidt, Klaus-Peter Schmitz, Niels Grabow, Kerstin Lebahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andreas GötzInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, Rostock University Medical Center, Friedrich-Barnewitz-Str. 4, 18119, Rostock, Germany. andreas.goetz@uni-rostock.de.
Sabine IllnerInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, Rostock University Medical Center, Friedrich-Barnewitz-Str. 4, 18119, Rostock, Germany.
Nicklas FiedlerInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, Rostock University Medical Center, Friedrich-Barnewitz-Str. 4, 18119, Rostock, Germany.
Julia SchubertInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, Rostock University Medical Center, Friedrich-Barnewitz-Str. 4, 18119, Rostock, Germany.
Jan OldenburgInstitute for ImplantTechnology and Biomaterials e.V., Friedrich-Barnewitz-Str. 4, 18119, Rostock, Germany.
Heinz MüllerCORTRONIK GmbH, Friedrich-Barnewitz-Str. 4a, 18119, Rostock, Germany.
Wolfram SchmidtInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, Rostock University Medical Center, Friedrich-Barnewitz-Str. 4, 18119, Rostock, Germany.
Klaus-Peter SchmitzInstitute for ImplantTechnology and Biomaterials e.V., Friedrich-Barnewitz-Str. 4, 18119, Rostock, Germany.
Niels GrabowInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, Rostock University Medical Center, Friedrich-Barnewitz-Str. 4, 18119, Rostock, Germany.
Kerstin LebahnInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, Rostock University Medical Center, Friedrich-Barnewitz-Str. 4, 18119, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is a common disease with a high prevalence. Incompetent venous valves are considered as one of the main causes. Besides compression therapy, various surgical therapies are practiced, whereby the reconstruction of valves is of central importance. There is an unmet clinical need, no valve prosthesis is commercially available to date. This work introduces two versions of a patented prosthetic bicuspid valve design made of electrospun thermoplastic silicone polycarbonate polyurethane (TSPCU) nanofiber leaflets attached in a nitinol stent, and their performance in static and pulsatile operation.

resultsThe valves mainly fulfill the requirements widely accepted in literature. Valves of both versions were functional in the physiological pressure range up to 50 mmHg with design specific differences.

conclusionsThe here introduced design versions act as a platform technology and can be tailored for an intended implantation site. Evaluation of the original and modified valve concept demonstrated efficacy, with limitations at higher loads for original design. At the current state, the modification is preferable for fabrication, as one processing step is eliminated. Moreover, specific design recommendations could be drawn for valves of similar basic structure. Future work will focus on long-term performance and biocompatibility prior to the initiation of preclinical in vivo studies.

Indexed as

Materials TestingProsthesis DesignVenous ValvesAlloysCathetersHumansMechanical PhenomenaMechanical TestsNanofibersAlloysChronic venous diseaseCVDCVIForward flowRefluxTestingValve implantVenous valve

Identifiers

PMID39614321
PMCPMC11606079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.