Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39614265›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024

Vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a protocol for a single-center doubled-blind randomized sham-controlled clinical trial. VOPE2.

Mikkel Ø Andersen, Andreas K Andresen, Jan Hartvigsen, A Pernille Hermann, Jan Sørensen, Leah Y Carreon

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06141187 (Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Vs. Sham for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Focusing on Pain and Economy), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06141187 narecruitingnot on this map

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Vs. Sham for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Focusing on Pain and Economy: a Single-center, Double-blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSpine Centre of Southern DenmarkRan2024 to 2030Enrolled240ConditionsOsteoporotic Fractures, Vertebral FractureArmsVertebroplasty, Sham Vertebroplasty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mikkel Ø AndersenCenter for Spine Surgery & Research, Sygehus Lillebaelt, Kolding Sygehus, Sygehusvej 24, Kolding, 6000, Denmark. Mikkel.andersen2@rsyd.dk.
Andreas K AndresenCenter for Spine Surgery & Research, Sygehus Lillebaelt, Kolding Sygehus, Sygehusvej 24, Kolding, 6000, Denmark.
Jan HartvigsenCenter for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
A Pernille HermannDepartment of Endocrinology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Jan SørensenHealthcare Outcome Research Centre, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Leah Y CarreonCenter for Spine Surgery & Research, Sygehus Lillebaelt, Kolding Sygehus, Sygehusvej 24, Kolding, 6000, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne in three women and one in five men over the age of 50 will experience an osteoporotic fracture. Vertebral fractures can be very painful, affect patients' daily function, and in severe cases require hospitalization. Traditionally, fracture pain is treated conservatively with analgesics, and bracing. Vertebral augmentation, also known as vertebroplasty, has been used during the last three decades as a minimally invasive treatment option for vertebral compression fractures, but the evidence base for its efficacy is weak. We describe a double-blind randomized sham-controlled clinical trial to assess the impact of vertebroplasty on self-reported clinical outcomes in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and vertebral oedema.

methodsTwo hundred and forty patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures and MRI verified oedema will be randomized in a prospective, double-blind, single-center, clinical trial to either vertebroplasty or a sham procedure, with the possibility of crossover 12 weeks after randomization and operation. The primary outcome will be difference in self-reported pain 12 weeks after treatment between the vertebroplasty and sham group. Secondary outcomes will be patient-reported disability, health-related quality of life, societal costs of treatment and complications. Analysis will be based on intention-to-treat. Repeated measures ANCOVA with baseline ODI, Numerical Pain Rating Scale, EQ-5D-5 L, and number of levels involved as co-variates will be performed. DISCUSSION: With an aging population, the prevalence of osteoporosis and related complications such as vertebral compression fractures is expected to increase. Therefore, there is a growing need for evidence-based fracture treatments. This study fills a gap in the evidence base for treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures and will likely influence future treatment guidelines.

trial registrationThe study has been evaluated and approved by the Regional Committees on Health Research for Southern Denmark October 9 2023 (Projekt-ID S-20230058) and the Danish Data Protection Agency 23/40,938. The protocol has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with trial registration number NCT06141187 November 21, 2023.

Indexed as

Fractures, CompressionOsteoporotic FracturesSpinal FracturesVertebroplastyAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeDouble blindPainRandomizedSham-controlledVertebroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39614265
PMCPMC11607804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.