Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39614238›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2024

Is virtual reality enhancing dental anatomy education? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Katarina Bevizova, Hisham El Falougy, Andrej Thurzo, Stefan Harsanyi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katarina BevizovaInstitute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Sasinkova 2, Bratislava, 811 08, Slovakia.
Hisham El FalougyInstitute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Sasinkova 2, Bratislava, 811 08, Slovakia.
Andrej ThurzoDepartment of Orthodontics, Regenerative and Forensic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Dvořákovo nábrežie 4, Bratislava, 811 02, Slovakia.
Stefan HarsanyiInstitute of Biology, Genetics, and Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Sasinkova 4, Bratislava, 811 08, Slovakia. stefan.harsanyi@fmed.uniba.sk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional dental anatomy education, reliant on cadaver dissections and lectures, faces challenges such as high costs, ethical concerns, and difficulty conveying complex 3D dental structures. Virtual reality (VR) offers a solution by providing immersive, interactive learning environments that can enhance students' understanding. This study systematically reviews the effectiveness of VR in dental anatomy education compared to traditional methods, focusing on its potential to improve learning outcomes.

methodsA comprehensive search was conducted across Web of Science (WoS), PubMed, and Scopus databases until May 2024. Data were extracted, summarized, and analyzed for qualitative synthesis. The following keywords and their combinations were used: " dental OR dentistry", "education OR teaching", "virtual AND reality OR VR", and "anatomy OR dental AND anatomy". Studies were included if they met the following criteria: Investigated the use of VR in anatomy education. Compared VR-based learning to other methods such as lecture-based teaching, 3D printed or natural models, or non-interactive 3D models. Quantitative synthesis was performed using standardized mean differences (SMD) with Hedges'd and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

resultsOut of 178 records screened, seven studies were included in the meta-analysis and eight in the personal evaluation analysis. The analysis indicates a moderately positive effect of VR on dental anatomy education (SMD = 0.74, p = 0.05) compared to lecture-based education using X-ray, CBCT, or 3D models. However, at the same time, VR falls short compared to clinical experience, training with physical teeth, or quality printed models. Studies reported rare cases of discomfort, disorientation, diplopic image, and VR sickness.

conclusionsThe use of VR-based learning moderately positively affects educational outcomes, and enhances knowledge retention, especially before clinical experience. The personal evaluation of students showed a strong interest in VR, with positive feedback on its ease of use, accuracy, and educational value.

Indexed as

AnatomyEducation, DentalVirtual RealityHumansDental educationDentistryMeta-analysisSystematic reviewVirtual realityVR

Identifiers

PMID39614238
PMCPMC11606172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.