Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39614227›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Influencing children: food cues in YouTube content from child and youth influencers.

Brigitte Naderer, Maria Wakolbinger, Sandra Haider, Mimi Tatlow-Golden, Magdalena Muc, Emma Boyland, Eva Winzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A Mixed Method Study Exploring Children and Young People's Perception of Energy Drinks and Analysing Consumption Patterns.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brigitte NadererDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Maria WakolbingerDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, Vienna, 1090, Austria. maria.wakolbinger@meduniwien.ac.at.
Sandra HaiderDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Mimi Tatlow-GoldenSchool of Education, Childhood, Youth and Sport, The Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK.
Magdalena MucSchool of Education, Childhood, Youth and Sport, The Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK.
Emma BoylandDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK.
Eva WinzerDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, Vienna, 1090, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Federal Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection 2022-0.359.107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital marketing of unhealthy foods is linked to childhood obesity. This study evaluated nutrient quality and creative strategies of food cues on social media, focusing on child/youth influencers, to inform the ongoing digital media regulatory debate. Using the WHO's Monitoring of Marketing of Unhealthy Products to Children and Adolescents protocol, 162 videos from seven child/youth influencers' YouTube accounts with German content (33.8 h) were analyzed, classifying foods and beverages as permitted or not based on the WHO Nutrient Profile Model. Two-thirds (67%) of the n = 901 food cues analyzed were not permitted for marketing to children, 30.4% were permitted, and 2.6% were miscellaneous. Chocolate had the biggest proportion (19.8%). Child-appealing food cues were significantly more likely to feature not permitted foods than permitted foods (91.1% vs. 71.9%, p < 0.001). Of branded foods, 46.5% were not permitted foods and 7.7% were permitted foods (p < 0.001), and of those with positive verbal attributions/reactions, 36.9% were not permitted foods, and 28.1% were permitted foods (p < 0.001). Similarly, compared to 36.9% of not permitted foods, only 28.1% of permitted foods were presented with positive verbal attributions/reactions (p < 0.001). Children are exposed to extensive appealing presentations of food not permitted for marketing to children via influencers on digital media. Policy makers need to become more active in monitoring and regulating this content.

Indexed as

CuesSocial MediaAdolescentChildFemaleFoodFood PreferencesGermanyHumansMaleMarketingNutritive ValuePediatric ObesityChild influencerChildrenDigital marketingFood and beverage cuesSocial media influencer

Identifiers

PMID39614227
PMCPMC11607801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.