Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39614222›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

A qualitative study of young workers' experience of the psychosocial work environment and how this affects their mental health.

Malte van Veen, Roosmarijn Mc Schelvis, Paulien M Bongers, Karen M Oude Hengel, Cécile Rl Boot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Malte van VeenNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Unit Healthy Living & Work, Sylviusweg 71, Leiden, 2333 BE, The Netherlands. malte.vanveen@amsterdamumc.nl.
Roosmarijn Mc SchelvisAmsterdam Public Health, Societal Participation & Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Paulien M BongersNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Unit Healthy Living & Work, Sylviusweg 71, Leiden, 2333 BE, The Netherlands.
Karen M Oude HengelNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Unit Healthy Living & Work, Sylviusweg 71, Leiden, 2333 BE, The Netherlands.
Cécile Rl BootAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Boelelaan, Amsterdam, 1117, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evidence base for the relationship between psychosocial work factors and mental health focuses primarily on the general working population but little is known about young workers. The aim of this qualitative study is to identify psychosocial work factors that affect the mental health of young workers, with a focus on (1) novel factors of the psychosocial work environment that are relevant for young workers but have not been described in the literature and (2) experiences of psychosocial work factors associated with mental health that are specific to and typical for young workers.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were held with 36 workers aged up to 30. Participants were asked to describe work situations that affected their mental health. Factors were identified using a combination of inductive and deductive coding and open-coded factors were mapped onto the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ), which is widely used as a framework for psychosocial work factors.

resultsMost of the psychosocial factors mentioned by the young workers could be mapped onto the COPSOQ framework and were therefore similar to the general working population. Novel factors identified by this study were "Procedural support" and "Responsibility for others". We also identified young-worker-specific experiences of psychosocial work factors associated with mental health (i.e. Quantitative Demands, Influence at Work, Commitment to the Workplace, Job Insecurity, Quality of work, Job satisfaction, and Vertical Trust). Lastly, young workers did not report the COPSOQ factor Insecurity over working conditions and Work-life conflict was reported as an indicator of mental health status rather than being perceived as a factor of the psychosocial work environment.

conclusionsPsychosocial work factors and their influence on mental health reported by young workers in this qualitative study are comparable to what is reported for the general working population. There are however some young-worker-specific experiences of psychosocial work factors and two novel factors. The novel factors, "Procedural support" and "Responsibility for others" are not found in common psychosocial work factor frameworks and might be studied specifically in relation to young workers. Our results provide organisations with levers that can be used to create a psychosocial work environment that benefits the mental health of young workers.

Indexed as

Mental HealthQualitative ResearchWorkplaceAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicJob SatisfactionMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesWorking ConditionsYoung AdultInterview studyMental healthPsychosocial work factorsYoung workers

Identifiers

PMID39614222
PMCPMC11607927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.