ArticleBMC surgery2024
Incidental findings in preoperative computed tomography images of robotic-assisted total joint replacement: a multi-center retrospective study.
Article in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe majority of robot-assisted total joint arthroplasties necessitate preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Incidental findings in these CT scans can introduce complexity into clinical treatment decisions. Consequently, this study sought to document the nature and frequency of incidental findings identified in preoperative CT imaging conducted for robot-assisted total joint arthroplasty, along with their impact on planned surgical procedures.
methodsThis investigation constitutes a retrospective review encompassing patients who underwent primary robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty between January 2020 and January 2022 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, the First Affiliated Hospital of Peking University, and Nanfang Hospital. It also includes patients who underwent robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty during the same period at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Peking University, Nanfang Hospital, and the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University. All CT examinations were initially interpreted by proficient musculoskeletal radiologists. Subsequently, the findings in the examination reports, whether significant or non-significant, were compiled and categorized.
resultsA total of 218 patients, median age 63, were evaluated; 90 had incidental findings (41.3%), with 56 (25.7%) significant. Males were more likely to have findings (P = 0.001). Nine needed additional imaging, and five required intervention.Our study highlights the impact of unexpected CT findings on surgical planning, which can delay or cancel surgeries and affect patient outcomes. It also urges surgeons to review medical histories and perform thorough examinations before surgery to prevent serious consequences.
conclusionsRadiologists often find incidental findings in preoperative CT scans for robot-assisted joint arthroplasty, with a 41.3% incidence rate. About 25.7% of these findings need physician follow-up, and under 5% require intervention, potentially causing delays or cancellations of procedures, while undetected findings could lead to fatal outcomes.Unexpected preoperative CT findings can enhance patient management and prevent complications, necessitating their inclusion in surgical protocols. Systematic assessment improves safety and outcomes, urging surgeons to review medical history and perform thorough examinations pre-surgery. CLINICAL
trial registrationClinical trial registration time: 19/05/2022, clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2200060115.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.