Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39614206›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

How much progress has been made toward a smoke-free environment in the restaurants and bars of Japan? Limitations of partial bans and their enforcement.

Aoi Kataoka, Isao Muraki, Masakazu Nakamura, Yuri Ito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pancreatic Cancer in High-Income Asia-Pacific: A Population-Based Study.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aoi KataokaDepartment of Medical Statistics, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Research & Development Center, 2-7 Daigaku-Machi, Takatsuki City, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan.
Isao MurakiDepartment of Public Health, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Masakazu NakamuraInstitute of Community Medicine, Japan Association for Development of Community Medicine, Yakushimaecho 70, Shimogyo-Ku, Kyoto City, Kyoto, 600-8416, Japan.
Yuri ItoDepartment of Medical Statistics, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Research & Development Center, 2-7 Daigaku-Machi, Takatsuki City, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan. yuri.ito@ompu.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn April 2020, the revised Health Promotion Act and Tokyo Metropolitan Ordinance to prevent second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure was fully enforced. The government has provided an exemption for small-scale, existing establishments by allowing them 'unregulated' status, and it is unclear to what extent indoor smoking bans have been applied in these small bars and restaurants. In this study, we report on indoor smoking status before/after the enforcement of the current legislation both regulated and unregulated restaurants and bars.

methodsSelf-questionnaire surveys were conducted in March 2020 and 2021. We applied the questionnaire to 6,000 restaurants and bars in Tokyo, Osaka and Aomori in the first survey and to 3609 restaurants in the second survey, including those that had responded to the first survey as well as 2800 additional establishments. We calculated the proportions of indoor smoking status before/after enforcement both regulated and unregulated establishments. In addition, we calculated the national estimate of indoor smoking status in all restaurants and bars in Japan after the enforcement using a restaurant guide website and the results of this study.

resultsThe responded establishments were 879 to the first (response rate: 14.7%) and 837 to the second (response rate: 23.2%). Of all the establishments, 67.0% kept "separate smoking or smoking" status, and 62.1% of unregulated establishments kept "separate smoking or smoking". Although all the regulated establishments were required to change to "no smoking" by law, 78.4% that were "separate smoking or smoking" before the enforcement did not change their indoor smoking status. The national estimate of smoking status showed that the proportion of "no smoking" would change from 54.5% to 69.4% after the enforcement. If all regulated establishments changed smoking status to "no smoking", the ideal proportion of "no smoking" would be 85.8% in Japan.

conclusionsMore unregulated restaurants and bars changed to "no smoking" than planned before the enforcement. In contrast, most of the regulated restaurants and bars continued to be "separate smoking or smoking" in non-compliance with the legislation. In order to prevent SHS exposure in all restaurants and bars, we need comprehensive legislation for indoor smoking bans in Japan.

Indexed as

RestaurantsSmoke-Free PolicyTobacco Smoke PollutionAir Pollution, IndoorHumansJapanSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco Smoke PollutionPassive smokingRestaurantsSecond hand smokingSmoke-free legislationSmoking CessationSmoking Prevention

Identifiers

PMID39614206
PMCPMC11606096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.