Trial reportBMC infectious diseases2024
Performance and acceptability of self-collected specimens for diagnosis of rectal and pharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections among men who have sex with men in China: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExtragenital Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infections are prevalent among men who have sex with men (MSM). Self-sampling could potentially eliminate barriers to extragenital CT/NG testing for MSM that are hard to reach, who refuse to go for clinician-based testing, or who decline an examination. However, the required evidence to determine whether self-collected specimens are as accurate as clinician-taken specimens in terms of CT/NG diagnostic accuracy was limited in low and middle income countries. We therefore compared self-collected rectal and pharyngeal specimens with clinician-taken specimens for diagnostic accuracy among MSM in China.
methodsThis was a prospective convenience sample from 6 sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics in China. We randomized the order of self-collected and clinician-taken specimens from the pharynx and rectum, plus first-void urine, for CT/NG detection. Self-sampling performance was compared with clinician-sampling as to agreement, sensitivity, and specificity. The acceptability of self-sampling was evaluated by questionnaire.
resultsAmong the 325 participants, prevalences of rectal CT and NG infections were 13.6% and 5.2% and pharyngeal CT and NG prevalences were 1.5% and 2.8%, respectively. The agreements between the CT tests with the self-collected and clinician-taken specimens were 98.8% (κ = 0.95, 95% CI 0.89-1.00) for rectal site and 99.4% (κ = 0.83, 95% CI 0.60-1.00) for pharyngeal site; and the agreements between NG tests were 99.4% (κ = 0.94, 95% CI 0.86-1.00) for rectal site and 98.2% (κ = 0.72, 95% CI 0.50-0.93) for pharyngeal site. The sensitivity and specificity of self-collected swabs was as follows: rectal CT: 93.0% and 99.6%; pharyngeal CT: 100.0% and 99.4%; rectal NG: 100.0% and 99.4%; pharyngeal NG: 88.9% and 98.4%. Self-collection was highly acceptable, showing that 62.0% MSM preferred self-sampling over clinician-sampling; 90.2% would use self-sampling for detection of CT and NG again.
conclusionsExtragenital screening for CT and NG should be recommended as part of STI services to MSM population. Self-collection of rectal and pharyngeal specimens had good performance for CT and NG tests and acceptability to the target population.
trial registrationThis trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2300073473. Registered 12/07/2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.