ArticleBMC cancer2024
Prognostic prediction for HER2-low breast cancer patients using a novel machine learning model.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors associated with overall survival in patients with cervical cancer: a prospective cohort study in Western China comparing random survival forest and Cox proportional hazards models.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026Article
- Comparison of Random Survival Forest Based-Overall Survival With Deep Learning and Cox Proportional Hazard Models in HER-2-Positive HR-Negative Breast Cancer.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundsTo develop a machine learning (ML) model for predicting the prognosis of breast cancer (BC) patients with low human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression, and to investigate the association between clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes in HER2-low BC (HLBC) patients.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 998 female HLBC patients treated at the Breast Center of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University (Hebei, China) between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020. To address class imbalance, the synthetic minority over-sampling technique was applied. Feature selection was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, followed by construction of the prediction model using the random forest algorithm. Model performance, including specificity and accuracy, was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and confusion matrix, comparing it against other ML models. Additionally, the log-rank test was employed to examine the relationship between selected features and patient outcomes in HLBC.
resultsThe random survival forest model demonstrated superior accuracy and specificity in predicting survival outcomes for HLBC patients. Compared with other ML models, it achieved more precise predictions of Disease-Free Survival (DFS) at 1, 2, and 3 years, with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) in the test and training cohorts measured at 0.726 and 0.819, 0.712 and 0.776, and 0.685 and 0.774, respectively. The analysis further identified a strong correlation between poor prognosis in HLBC patients and factors such as axillary lymph node dissection, family history, elevated topoisomerase (TOPO)-2 expression, advanced clinical stage, negative progesterone receptor status, P53 mutation, and increased Ki67 expression, observed across both cohorts.
conclusionsA novel ML model was developed for accurate prognosis prediction in HLBC patients, offering valuable insights into prognostic risk factors. This model equips clinicians with enhanced data to guide treatment decisions, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.