ArticleBMC pediatrics2024
Impact of normal vs. caesarean deliveries on child nutritional status and mortality in India: insights from NFHS-5 data.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between iron supplementation during pregnancy and delivery mode on double burden of malnutrition in South Asia: A cross-sectional survey study.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2026Article
- Caesarean deliveries and double burden of malnutrition: a multicountry analysis in South and Southeast Asia.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSkilled birth attendance and place of delivery have a significant effect on child growth. The present paper examined the mode of delivery and its impact on child health among children 0-59 months in India.
methodsA total of 200,794 samples were used in the study. Among them, 45,784 births were delivered by C-section, and the remaining 150,010 births were delivered through normal delivery. Life table estimation of mortality, as well as bivariate and multivariate logistic regression, were used to identify the association between child health and mode of delivery using data from the fifth round of the National Family Health Survey conducted in 2019-21.
resultsThe study results indicate that children born through normal delivery had significantly lower rates of stunting, wasting, and underweight compared to those born via C-section. Additionally, the likelihood of a new-born baby dying during the neonatal period was higher for those delivered by C-section compared to those delivered vaginally, which holds true for various background characteristics. Mothers with a 3rd or higher order birth who deliver via C-section face a higher risk of their baby dying during the neonatal and infant periods compared to those with a 2nd order birth.
conclusionThe conclusion of the study found that C-section delivery may adversely affect child undernutrition as compared to normal birth. These findings would help formulate the policies and implement actions that would improve the quality of painless labor and immediate delivery in health facilities particularly public hospitals and shall reduce the C-section birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.