ArticleScientific reports2024
Risk of canine distemper virus vaccination of domestic dogs in giant panda habitat to giant pandas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of canine parvovirus-2-based recombinant pseudoviruses expression system: a potential vaccine platform.Veterinary research · 2026Article
- Safeguarding a Flagship Species: Integrated Surveillance of Cross-Species Pathogen Transmission in Giant Panda Ecosystems.Ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- Safety and Immunogenicity of a Canine Distemper DNA Vaccine Formulated with Lipid Nanoparticles in Dogs, Foxes, and Raccoon Dogs.Vaccines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The giant panda (Ailuropioda melanoleuca), a unique relic species in China and a global biodiversity conservation symbol, faces the threat of canine distemper virus (CDV). Vaccinating domestic dogs in panda habitats against CDV is crucial, yet the associated risks remain understudied. We investigated the safety of CDV vaccination in 69 domestic dogs within panda habitats, employing enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for CDV antibodies and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for viral RNA, a marker of viral shedding. Results revealed that vaccinated dogs posed a risk through viral shedding, mainly starting from the ninth day post-vaccination. Unvaccinated dogs exhibited increased CDV antibodies and subsequent shedding, with phylogenetic analysis confirming infection from vaccinated dogs in shared kennels. Dogs with higher initial antibodies displayed reduced shedding and a markedly abbreviated shedding duration (6.7 days) than those with lower initial antibodies (9.8 days). Habitat area analysis revealed substantial overlaps between domestic dogs and wild giant pandas in two nature reserves in China. To safeguard wildlife, particularly giant pandas, we recommend restricting vaccinated dogs' activity for at least three weeks post-vaccination, complementing existing management practices. We advocate collaborative efforts among local authorities, reserve management and villagers for effective vaccination and post-vaccination management of domestic dogs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.