ArticleInsights into imaging2024
Contrast-enhanced US Bosniak Classification: intra- and inter-rater agreement, confounding features, and diagnostic performance.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Efficacy and Safety of Dehydrated Alcohol Versus Lauromacrogol for Sclerotherapy of Simple Renal Cysts: A Retrospective Comparison Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- CEUS in Atypical Renal Cystic Masses: How, When and Why.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Imaging Assessment of Complex Renal Cysts: Comparative Value of Superb Microvascular Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- ChatGPT-4V prompt: A tool to enhance junior radiologists' diagnostic capabilities in cystic renal masses to senior-level accuracy.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) Bosniak classification, proposed by the European Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) in 2020, predicts malignancy in cystic renal masses (CRMs). However, intra- and inter-rater reproducibility for CEUS features has not been well investigated. PURPOSE: To explore intra- and inter-rater agreement for US features, identify confounding features, and assess the diagnostic performance of CEUS Bosniak classification. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included patients with complex CRMs who underwent CEUS examination from January 2013 to August 2023. Radiologists (3 experts and 3 novices) evaluated calcification, echogenic content, wall, septa, and internal nodules of CRMs using CEUS Bosniak classification. Intra- and inter-rater agreements were assessed using the Gwet agreement coefficient (Gwet's AC). Linear regression identified features associated with discrepancies in Bosniak category assignment. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
resultsA total of 103 complex CRMs were analyzed in 103 patients (mean age, 50 ± 15 years; 66 males). Intra-rater agreement for the Bosniak category was substantial to almost perfect (Gwet's AC 0.73-0.87). Inter-rater agreement was substantial for the Bosniak category (Gwet's AC 0.75) and moderate to almost perfect for US features (Gwet's AC 0.44-0.94). Nodule variation (i.e., absence vs. obtuse margin vs. acute margin) explained 84% of the variability in the Bosniak category assignment. CEUS Bosniak classification showed good diagnostic performance, with AUCs ranging from 0.78 to 0.90 for each rater.
conclusionsCEUS Bosniak classification demonstrated substantial intra- and inter-rater reproducibility and good diagnostic performance in predicting the malignancy potential of CRMs. Nodule variations significantly predicted differences in Bosniak category assignments. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Contrast-enhanced US Bosniak classification reliably predicts malignancy in cystic renal masses, demonstrating substantial reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy. This improves clinical decision-making and patient management. KEY POINTS: Intra- and inter-rater reproducibility for contrast-enhance US features for Bosniak classification have not been well investigated. Substantial inter-rater agreements for the Bosniak category and variable agreements for determining imaging features were found. Contrast-enhanced US Bosniak classification is reproducible and has good diagnostic performance for predicting malignancy in cystic renal masses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.