Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39613978›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2025

External validation of the performance of commercially available deep-learning-based lung nodule detection on low-dose CT images for lung cancer screening in Japan.

Wataru Fukumoto, Yuki Yamashita, Ikuo Kawashita, Toru Higaki, Asako Sakahara, Yuko Nakamura, Yoshikazu Awaya, Kazuo Awai

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wataru FukumotoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minamiku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan. wfukumoto@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7645-8446
Yuki YamashitaSchool of Medicine, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minamiku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Ikuo KawashitaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minamiku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Toru HigakiGraduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, 1-4-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, 739-8527, Japan.
Asako SakaharaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minamiku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Yuko NakamuraDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minamiku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Yoshikazu AwayaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Miyoshi Central Hospital, 10531 Higashi-Sakaya-cho, Miyoshi, Hiroshima, 728-8502, Japan.
Kazuo AwaiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minamiku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeArtificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for lung nodule detection have been developed to assist radiologists. However, external validation of its performance on low-dose CT (LDCT) images is insufficient. We examined the performance of the commercially available deep-learning-based lung nodule detection (DL-LND) using LDCT images at Japanese lung cancer screening (LCS). MATERIALS AND

methodsIncluded were 43 patients with suspected lung cancer on LDCT images and pathologically confirmed lung cancer. The reference standard for nodules whose diameter exceeded 4 mm was set by a radiologist who referred to the reports of two other radiologists reading the LDCT images. After we applied commercially available DL-LND to the LDCT images, the radiologist reviewed all nodules detected by DL-LND. When he failed to identify an existing nodule, it was also included in the reference standard. To validate the performance of DL-LND, the sensitivity for lung nodules and lung cancer, the positive-predictive value (PPV) for lung nodules, and the mean number of false-positive (FP) nodules per CT scan were recorded.

resultsThe radiologist detected 97 nodules including 43 lung cancers and missed 3 solid nodules detected by DL-LND. A total of 100 nodules was included in the reference standard. DL-LND detected 396 nodules including 40 lung cancers. The sensitivity for the 100 nodules was 96.0%; the PPV was 24.2% (96/396). The mean number of FP nodules per CT scan was 7.0; sensitivity for lung cancer was 93.0% (40/43). DL-LND missed three lung cancers; 2 of these were atypical pulmonary cysts.

conclusionWe externally verified that the sensitivity for lung nodules and lung cancer by DL-LND was very high. However, its low PPV and the increased FP nodules remains a serious drawback of DL-LND.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEarly Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedArtificial IntelligenceFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedReference StandardsSensitivity and SpecificityArtificial intelligenceAtypical pulmonary cystComputed-aided detectionLung cancer screeningLung nodule

Identifiers

PMID39613978
PMCPMC11953200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.