Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39613956›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Validation of the Node Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) for standardized CT evaluation of regional lymph nodes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Yu Fang, Ming Chen, XuFeng Zheng, Yubin Yao, Kainan Huang, Silian Chen, Tingting Xu, Zhuangyong Xu, Daiying Lin

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Node-RADS in cervical cancer: a multi-reader agreement and diagnostic performance study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yu FangDepartment of Radiology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, 515031, People's Republic of China.
Ming ChenDepartment of Radiology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, 515031, People's Republic of China.
XuFeng ZhengDepartment of Radiology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, 515031, People's Republic of China.
Yubin YaoDepartment of Radiology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, 515031, People's Republic of China.
Kainan HuangDepartment of Radiology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, 515031, People's Republic of China.
Silian ChenDepartment of Radiology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, 515031, People's Republic of China.
Tingting XuDepartment of Radiology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, 515031, People's Republic of China.
Zhuangyong Xu *Department of Radiology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, 515031, People's Republic of China. xuzhuangyong@163.com.
Daiying Lin *Department of Radiology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, 515031, People's Republic of China. lindaiying917@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2969-5136

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe accurate identification of positive lymph nodes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) influences patient risk assessment and treatment decisions, but there is no standardized approach for radiological evaluation. The aim of this study was to verify the diagnostic performance of the new Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS) in the assessment of lymph node metastasis in patients with ESCC, as verified by final histopathology.

methodsNode-RADS is a scoring system composed of different criteria for evaluating lymph node metastasis, with scores ranging from 1 to 5, corresponding to the degree of suspicion of lymph node involvement. In this single-center study, Node-RADS was used to retrospectively evaluate regional lymph nodes in 173 ESCC patients who underwent computed tomography (CT) before radical resection. In addition, the area under the ROC curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for the Node-RADS score and individual criteria.

resultsNode-RADS outperformed the individual assessment criteria (AUC: 94.3%, sensitivity: 96.5%, specificity: 92.0%), with scores ≥ 3 indicating the maximum diagnostic effectiveness. The diagnostic efficiency of the highest Node-RADS score surpassed that of the short axis score (AUC: 94.3% vs. 81.9%, p < 0.001). Our results indicated that the best diagnostic cut-off points for the short axis, long axis and short axis/long axis ratio were 9 mm, 11 mm, and 0.74, respectively.

conclusionNode-RADS has emerged as a practical, repetitive method for the early identification of high-risk metastatic lymph nodes, providing therapeutic guidance and predicting disease prognosis in ESCC patients. KEY POINTS: Question How does the Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS) perform in the assessment of lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)? Findings The maximum diagnostic efficiency was achieved with a Node-RADS score of ≥ 3. Clinical relevance The Node-RADS has improved diagnostic efficiency for distinguishing lymph node metastasis in patients with ESCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellEsophageal NeoplasmsLymph NodesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityComputed tomography (CT)Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)Lymph nodeNode Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.