ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound for symptomatic uterine fibroids: clinical outcome of two European centers.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of high intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of uterine fibroids in overweight/obese women.BMC women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study is to assess the clinical outcome and mid-term efficacy of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) as a treatment for symptomatic uterine fibroids at two major European HIFU centers. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis bi-center longitudinal clinical study involved the treatment of 100 patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids using USgHIFU (n = 59 in Germany, n = 41 in Bulgaria). Clinical outcomes were evaluated at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year follow-up utilizing the uterine fibroid symptoms-quality of life questionnaire for fibroid-related symptoms and health-related quality of life as well as MRI imaging for determining the fibroid volume.
resultsThe mean fibroid volume reduction rate was 33.2 ± 22.9%, 51.3 ± 24.2%, and 59.1 ± 28.0% at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year, respectively (each p < 0.001). The mean symptom severity score decreased from 43.9 ± 18.8 at baseline to 35.4 ± 18.2 at 6 weeks, 31.1 ± 20.0 at 6 months, and 23.1 ± 14.0 at 1 year (each p < 0.001). The mean QOL score improved from 56.5 ± 23.4 at baseline to 65.4 ± 22.2 at 6 weeks, 72.5 ± 19.5 at 6 months, and 79.4 ± 15.3 at 1 year (each p < 0.001). No major complications were observed, though two patients experienced temporary sciatic nerve irritation following the procedure. Four patients had pregnancies and deliveries without any complications after USgHIFU therapy.
conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first longitudinal study conducted in two major European HIFU centers that reveals the clinical efficacy of USgHIFU ablation on symptomatic uterine fibroids. Our results confirm that USgHIFU is a non-invasive approach with a low risk of complications, offering an innovative treatment option for affected women. KEY POINTS: Question To evaluate mid-term clinical efficacy and safety of US-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for treating symptomatic uterine fibroids and patient outcomes across two European centers. Findings US-guided HIFU treatment resulted in significant fibroid volume reduction (up to 59.1% after 1 year) improving symptoms and quality of life with no major complications. Clinical relevance This prospective longitudinal study provides preliminary data assessing mid-term efficacy and clinical outcomes of ultrasound-guided HIFU. It is shown to be a low-risk, non-invasive treatment option for symptomatic uterine fibroids that reduces fibroid size and improves patients' quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.