Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39613936›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2025

Interfaith Collaboration: Boundary Crossing in a Participatory Action Research Project with Health Care Chaplains in The Netherlands.

Iris R Wierstra, Carmen Schuhmann, Jaelle Collard, Ben Oosterom, Gaby Jacobs

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iris R WierstraChair Group Humanist Chaplaincy Studies for a Plural Society, University of Humanistic Studies, Kromme Nieuwegracht 29, 3512 HD, Utrecht, The Netherlands. i.wierstra@uvh.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7587-8887
Carmen SchuhmannChair Group Humanist Chaplaincy Studies for a Plural Society, University of Humanistic Studies, Kromme Nieuwegracht 29, 3512 HD, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4383-717X
Jaelle Collard, Banneweg 57, 4204 AA, Gorinchem, The Netherlands.
Ben Oosterom, Banneweg 57, 4204 AA, Gorinchem, The Netherlands.
Gaby JacobsChair Group Humanist Chaplaincy Studies for a Plural Society, University of Humanistic Studies, Kromme Nieuwegracht 29, 3512 HD, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5908-9017

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article explores the challenges faced by a multifaith chaplaincy team in a Dutch health care organization when searching for a shared professional identity regarding the role of worldview and religion. Using boundary theory, we show how the diverse worldviews and the contradictory visions on their role for chaplaincy's professional identity led to misunderstandings and conflict. However, open and respectful dialogue about these differences helped clarify disagreements and identify common ground. The findings suggest that in secular contexts worldview remains significant in chaplaincy and that engaging in dialogue about worldviews and seeking connections across differences is the basis for a shared professional identity.

Indexed as

Chaplaincy Service, HospitalClergyCooperative BehaviorPastoral CareReligion and MedicineHealth Services ResearchHumansNetherlandsProfessional RoleBoundary crossingChaplaincyHealth careInterfaith collaborationParticipatory action research

Identifiers

PMID39613936
PMCPMC11950047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.