Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39613918›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2024

Non-metastatic causes of multiple pulmonary nodules.

Esra Akçiçek, Gamze Durhan, Selin Ardalı Düzgün, Olcay Kurtulan, Meltem Gülsün Akpınar, Figen Demirkazık, Orhan Macit Arıyürek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Tuberculosis Presenting as Multiple Pulmonary Nodules Mimicking Malignancy.Journal of investigative medicine high impact case reports
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Esra AkçiçekDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Gamze DurhanDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. gamzedurhan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6281-9287
Selin Ardalı DüzgünDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Olcay KurtulanDepartment of Pathology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Meltem Gülsün AkpınarDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Figen DemirkazıkDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Orhan Macit ArıyürekDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various processes, including benign or malignant (mostly metastasis) processes, contribute to the occurrence of multiple pulmonary nodules. For differential diagnosis, metastasis must be excluded as an etiological factor in patients who have multiple pulmonary nodules with a known primary malignancy. However, differential diagnosis of multiple pulmonary nodules caused by benign diseases and malignant processes is challenging. Multiple pulmonary nodules resulting from metastasis may mimic those resulting from infections, inflammatory processes, and rare benign diseases. Some rare diseases, such as pulmonary sclerosing pneumocytoma and pulmonary epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, or common diseases with a rare presentation of multiple nodules must be considered in the differential diagnosis of metastasis. In addition to the clinical and laboratory findings, radiological features are crucial for differential diagnosis. The size, density, location, and border characteristics (well-defined or poorly defined) of pulmonary nodules, as well as their internal structure (solid, subsolid, or ground glass nodule), growth rate during follow-up, and associated pulmonary and extrapulmonary findings are important for differential diagnosis along with clinical and laboratory data. This article summarizes the general features and imaging findings of these diseases, which less frequently present with multiple pulmonary nodules, and the clues that can be used to distinguish these diseases from metastasis. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The radiological features, clinical findings, and temporal changes during follow-up are important in distinguishing non-metastatic causes of multiple pulmonary nodules from metastatic causes and guiding diagnosis and early treatment, especially in patients with primary malignancy. KEY POINTS: Multiple pulmonary nodules have a wide range of etiologies, including metastatic disease. Metastasis as an etiology must be excluded in patients with multiple pulmonary nodules. Correlation of radiological findings (nodule size, position, and associated findings) with clinical history is crucial for differential diagnosis.

Indexed as

Computed tomographyDiagnostic imagingMetastasisMultiple pulmonary nodules

Identifiers

PMID39613918
PMCPMC11607223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.