ReviewEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2025
Advances in the study of nebulized tranexamic acid for pulmonary hemorrhage.
Review in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances and challenges in the management of haemoptysis in the emergency department: A narrative review.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2026Article
- Review
- Lung Involvement in Patients with Leptospirosis in Tropical Australia; Associations, Clinical Course and Implications for Management.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
- The Novel Application of Surgiflo and Successful Hemostasis of Refractory Intrapulmonary Hemorrhage in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.Critical care explorations · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePulmonary hemorrhage is a life-threatening condition characterized by blood leakage into lung tissues, leading to severe respiratory distress. Nebulized tranexamic acid (TXA) has emerged as a promising treatment option for pulmonary hemorrhage due to its localized hemostatic effects and minimal systemic side effects. This review aims to summarize the research progress on the effectiveness and safety of nebulized TXA in pulmonary hemorrhage.
methodsA comprehensive search of the Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases was conducted to identify relevant studies published between the date of inception of each database and November 2023. A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases using the following keywords: "hemoptysis," "haemoptysis," "pulmonary hemorrhage," "tranexamic acid," "antifibrinolytic," "nebulize," and "inhale." Additional articles were identified by reviewing the references of the retrieved studies. Studies were selected based on their focus on the application of nebulized TXA for pulmonary hemorrhage. The authors and dates of publication, study type, patients, diseases, intervention and main outcomes of these papers are tabulated. This consisted of two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), six case series, and nine case reports.
resultsThe commonly used dosage of nebulized TXA in the studies reviewed was 500 mg/5 ml, administered 3-4 times daily. Evidence suggests that nebulized TXA effectively controls bleeding in pulmonary hemorrhage with a hemostatic efficacy comparable to systemic administration, but with a lower risk of venous thrombosis. Safety data indicates that nebulized TXA is generally well-tolerated, with no significant systemic adverse reactions reported. Local reactions, such as bronchospasm, were rare and resolved with short-term bronchodilator treatment.
conclusionNebulized TXA appears to be an innovative and minimally invasive therapy for pulmonary hemorrhage, providing targeted hemostatic effects with a favorable safety profile. However, the predominance of small-scale studies and case reports highlights the need for large-scale, high-quality research to establish standardized guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.