ArticleBritish journal of cancer2025
Tumor budding and lymphovascular invasion as prognostic factors in p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial transcriptomics reveals a molecular tumor budding signature in head and neck cancer.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Multi-omics analysis to uncover the molecular basis of tumor budding in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to validate the prognostic significance of tumor budding (TB) in p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC).
methodsWe analyzed digitized H&E-stained slides from a multicenter cohort of five large university centers consisting of n = 275 cases of p16-positive OPSCC. We evaluated TB along with other histological parameters (morphology, tumor-stroma-ratio, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion) and calculated survival outcomes using both univariate and multivariate analyses.
resultsTB was identified as an independent prognostic parameter, with TB-high cases showing inferior outcomes in univariate (HR: 3.08, 95%-CI: 1.71-5.54) and multivariate analyses (HR: 4.03, 95%-CI: 1.65-9.83). Similarly, LVI remained an independent prognostic factor (HR: 3.00, 95%-CI: 1.22-7.38). A combined classification including TB and LVI stratified cases into low-, intermediate- and high-risk categories. We could not detect correlations between TB and the number of lymph node metastases or between TB and an extracapsular extension of lymph node metastases.
conclusionsIn addition to LVI, we could identify TB as an independent prognostic factor in p16-positive OPSCC in this multicenter study cohort. Thus, evaluating TB along with LVI in a combined scheme for prognostication might help to establish a more personalized treatment regimen for patients with p16-positive OPSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.