ArticleScientific reports2024
Investigation on multiple traffic noise near an airport and their effect on nearby residents.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multifunctional Polyaniline-Based Composite Materials: Innovative Research on Excellent Sound Absorption, UV Resistance, Wear Resistance, and Hydrophilic and Moisture Permeability Properties.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Sound quality control method of 110 kV transformer based on distributed variable stiffness dynamic vibration absorber.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Investigation of the Noise Emitted from Elevated Urban Rail Transit Paved with Various Resilient Tracks.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of the noise radiated from airplanes, urban rail transit, high-speed railways, and urban roads on residents near an airport. The results showed that all respondents near the airport were highly annoyed with airplane noise, and some remain annoyed with the noise from the urban rail transit and high-speed railway connecting to the airport. The most detrimental aspect of transportation noise was sleeping disturbance. Transportation noise from 19:00 to 24:00 primarily caused the annoyance of surrounding residents. Airplane noise is the largest source of sound pollution in residences in the region adjacent to the elevated urban rail transit and airport. The insertion loss of vertical sound barrier with a height of 2.4 m at the points 25 m away from the track centerline is 6.9-8.6 dB, but the sound pressure level below 40 Hz is amplified owing to the structure-borne noise radiating from the barrier itself. The presence of sound barriers can reduce the high annoyance level from 24 to 8.2%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.